{
  "id": 2552836,
  "name": "Village of Homewood, a Municipal Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Melvin K. Meyer, Chief of Police of the Village of Homewood, Appellant, v. William E. Dauber, Defendant-Appellee",
  "name_abbreviation": "Village of Homewood v. Dauber",
  "decision_date": "1967-06-30",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. M-51,600",
  "first_page": "127",
  "last_page": "128",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "85 Ill. App. 2d 127"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "384 US 757",
      "category": "reporters:federal",
      "reporter": "U.S.",
      "case_ids": [
        12047531
      ],
      "year": 1966,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/us/384/0757-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "122 NE2d 838",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.2d",
      "year": 1954,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "3 Ill App2d 562",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App. 2d",
      "case_ids": [
        5128667
      ],
      "year": 1954,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app-2d/3/0562-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "192 NE2d 401",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.2d",
      "year": 1963,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "42 Ill App 2d 410",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App. 2d",
      "case_ids": [
        5248237
      ],
      "year": 1963,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app-2d/42/0410-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "142 NE2d 818",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.2d",
      "weight": 3,
      "year": 1957,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "14 Ill App2d 81",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App. 2d",
      "case_ids": [
        5173629
      ],
      "weight": 3,
      "year": 1957,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app-2d/14/0081-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "55 F2d 67",
      "category": "reporters:federal",
      "reporter": "F.2d",
      "case_ids": [
        1807178
      ],
      "year": 1932,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/f2d/55/0067-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 222,
    "char_count": 2539,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.647,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.0821080688488016
    },
    "sha256": "711642f069658ed22470fbb0f5054bca0b624468a04793f9b229fc437b3af2a4",
    "simhash": "1:ac6bdd75ad06bedb",
    "word_count": 408
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:34:40.913901+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Village of Homewood, a Municipal Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Melvin K. Meyer, Chief of Police of the Village of Homewood, Appellant, v. William E. Dauber, Defendant-Appellee."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "MR. PRESIDING JUSTICE MURPHY\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nDefendant was found guilty and fined for a Village traffic violation. The trial court then ordered the Chief of Police of the Village of Homewood to return to defendant his fingerprints and photographs, which were taken at time of arrest. The Village of Homewood and the Chief of Police appeal. Defendant has filed no brief.\nThe appellants\u2019 contentions and authorities cited in support include: (1) fingerprinting and photographing arrested persons is a vital and necessary element of modern law enforcement (United States v. Kelly, 55 F2d 67 (1932); Kolb v. O\u2019Connor, 14 Ill App2d 81, 142 NE2d 818 (1957)); (2) there is no Illinois statutory provision which bars police acquisition of fingerprints or photographs in traffic violation cases (Kolb v. O\u2019Connor, 14 Ill App2d 81, 142 NE2d 818; People v. Lewerenz, 42 Ill App 2d 410, 192 NE2d 401 (1963)); and (3) fingerprinting and photographing does not violate any constitutional right (Poyer v. Boustead, 3 Ill App2d 562, 122 NE2d 838 (1954); Schmerber v. California, 384 US 757 (1966)).\nAlthough defendant was convicted of a misdemeanor, we are not persuaded that this classification of the offense is determinative of the issue presented. We believe the guidelines set forth in Kolb v. O\u2019Connor, 14 Ill App2d 81, 142 NE2d 818, apply here. There the court concluded (p 91):\n\u201cThe rights of the individual must be subordinate to the safety of the public. The question involved here is one of public policy. The legislature has not indicated what the public policy of the State should be. Without a specific mandate of the legislature ordering the return to an arrested person of all records of identification held by sheriffs or police departments we are constrained to hold that such departments may retain in their files records of identification such as were here taken, for the purpose of such limited exhibition as is here involved.\u201d\nFor the reasons given, the order of the trial court to return to defendant his fingerprints and photographs is reversed.\nReversed.\nBURMAN and ADESKO, JJ., concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "MR. PRESIDING JUSTICE MURPHY"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Richard W. Austin, Stanley A. Walton, HI, and Walter D. Cummings, of Chicago (Winston, Strawn, Smith & Patterson, of counsel), for appellants.",
      "No brief filed for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Village of Homewood, a Municipal Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Melvin K. Meyer, Chief of Police of the Village of Homewood, Appellant, v. William E. Dauber, Defendant-Appellee.\nGen. No. M-51,600.\nFirst District, First Division.\nJune 30, 1967.\nRichard W. Austin, Stanley A. Walton, HI, and Walter D. Cummings, of Chicago (Winston, Strawn, Smith & Patterson, of counsel), for appellants.\nNo brief filed for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0127-01",
  "first_page_order": 133,
  "last_page_order": 134
}