{
  "id": 5315438,
  "name": "John Dorbin, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. Yellow Cab Company, et al., Defendant-Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Dorbin v. Yellow Cab Co.",
  "decision_date": "1971-08-13",
  "docket_number": "No. 54898",
  "first_page": "113",
  "last_page": "114",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "1 Ill. App. 3d 113"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "99 N.E.2d 915",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "344 Ill.App. 40",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        2427558
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/344/0040-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "227 N.E.2d 84",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "82 Ill.App.2d 105",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App. 2d",
      "case_ids": [
        2560990
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app-2d/82/0105-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "101 N.E. 524",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "258 Ill. 365",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        4724405
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/258/0365-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "101 Ill.App. 2d 431",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App. 2d",
      "case_ids": [
        2902568
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app-2d/101/0431-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 178,
    "char_count": 1907,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.734,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.011366849708904e-07,
      "percentile": 0.5422690666521485
    },
    "sha256": "ad0045d7f6d3ffb6957a72cb3a2e2f78bb57a0a40fe0913ae4426561f6f2d3e7",
    "simhash": "1:1c401d96c98552e2",
    "word_count": 306
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:27:55.359601+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "John Dorbin, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. Yellow Cab Company, et al., Defendant-Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. JUSTICE LORENZ\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nThis is an action for personal injuries allegedly sustained by plaintiff in a collision of plaintiff\u2019s automobile and defendant\u2019s taxicab.\nThe complaint was filed November 18, 1966. On December 29, 1989, on defendant\u2019s motion the suit was dismissed for plaintiff\u2019s failure to answer interrogatories. On January 27, 1970, the court entered an order vacating the dismissal order of December 29, 1969, directing plaintiff to file his answers to the interrogatories within fourteen days and setting trial for April 6, 1970.\nDefendant seeks to appeal from the order of January 27, 1970. Plaintiff has moved this court to dismiss the appeal, for the reason that the order is not appealable.\nIn Stoller Lumber Co. v. Cosmopolitan Nat. Bank (1988), 101 Ill.App. 2d 431 the court said: \u201cSection 50(5) of the Civil Practice Act provides that the court may on motion filed within thirty days after entry thereof, set aside any final order, judgment or decree upon any terms and conditions that shall be reasonable. There is no appeal from an order entered pursuant to this section. See City of Park Ridge v. Murphy, 258 Ill. 365, 101 N.E. 524; Natale v. Enterprise Pub. Co., 82 Ill.App.2d 105, 227 N.E.2d 84, and Tinkoff v. Wharton, 344 Ill.App. 40, 99 N.E.2d 915. The order vacating the decree, entered within thirty days from the entry of the decree, was interlocutory and not appealable. Therefore the appeal is dismissed.\u201d\nThe order appealed from was an interlocutory nonappealable order and the appeal must therefore be dismissed.\nAppeal dismissed.\nENGLISH, P. J. and DRUCKER, J., concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. JUSTICE LORENZ"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Julius Jesmer, Charles E. Tannen, of Chicago, (Jesmer & Harris, of counsel,) for appellant.",
      "Robert E. Cleveland, of Chicago, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "John Dorbin, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. Yellow Cab Company, et al., Defendant-Appellant.\n(No. 54898;\nFirst District\nAugust 13, 1971.\nJulius Jesmer, Charles E. Tannen, of Chicago, (Jesmer & Harris, of counsel,) for appellant.\nRobert E. Cleveland, of Chicago, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0113-01",
  "first_page_order": 133,
  "last_page_order": 134
}