{
  "id": 5679365,
  "name": "In re J.W.M., a Minor (The People of the State of Illinois, Petitioner-Appellee, v. J.W.M., Respondent-Appellant)",
  "name_abbreviation": "People v. J.W.M.",
  "decision_date": "1984-05-09",
  "docket_number": "No. 4\u201483\u20140801",
  "first_page": "1036",
  "last_page": "1037",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "123 Ill. App. 3d 1036"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "122 Ill. App. 3d 573",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App. 3d",
      "case_ids": [
        3522458
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app-3d/122/0573-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "453 N.E.2d 139",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.2d",
      "year": 1984,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "117 Ill. App. 3d 698",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App. 3d",
      "case_ids": [
        3481117
      ],
      "year": 1984,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app-3d/117/0698-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "451 N.E.2d 289",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.2d",
      "year": 1983,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "115 Ill. App. 3d 993",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App. 3d",
      "case_ids": [
        3557762
      ],
      "year": 1983,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app-3d/115/0993-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "429 N.E.2d 501",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.2d",
      "year": 1983,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "87 Ill. 2d 56",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. 2d",
      "case_ids": [
        3031635
      ],
      "year": 1983,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-2d/87/0056-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 181,
    "char_count": 1729,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.763,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.4821559575369952e-07,
      "percentile": 0.6612989792068958
    },
    "sha256": "e348b3ec6b98439e03682eeb568fbb9eb8604c448e3546b0b56775e125239031",
    "simhash": "1:33ce1581981d7e34",
    "word_count": 288
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:44:31.202001+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "In re J.W.M., a Minor (The People of the State of Illinois, Petitioner-Appellee, v. J.W.M., Respondent-Appellant)."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PRESIDING JUSTICE MILLS\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nThe minor was committed as a delinquent.\nHis mother and father (with their addresses) were named in the petition.\nTh\u00e9 record does not reveal that notice was given to either parent of the hearings \u2014 adjudicatory and/or dispositional.\nOnly the mother was present at each.\nThe Juvenile Court Act provides that every parent, legal guardian, and custodian \u2014 or when necessary, the nearest relative \u2014 must be named as a respondent, and each is to be individually served unless that is not feasible, in which case service may be by publication. Ill. Rev. Stat. 1981, ch. 37, pars. 704-1, 704-3, 704-4.\nThe dispositional report here reflects that the minor visits his father often and receives spending money from him, and the minor says he has a good relationship with his father.\nThese facts distinguish this case from the exceptions to the notice requirements carved out by In re J.W. (1981), 87 Ill. 2d 56, 429 N.E.2d 501, In re L.E.J. (1983), 115 Ill. App. 3d 993, 451 N.E.2d 289, In re R.S. (1983), 117 Ill. App. 3d 698, 453 N.E.2d 139, and In re J.P.J. (1984), 122 Ill. App. 3d 573.\nNotice to all required by the Act is mandatory.\nThe State confesses error.\nReversed and remanded.\nTRAPP and WEBBER, JJ., concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PRESIDING JUSTICE MILLS"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Daniel D. Yuhas and Janet Sinder, both of State Appellate Defender\u2019s Officer, of Springfield, for appellant.",
      "Thomas J. Difanis, State\u2019s Attorney, of Urbana (Robert J. Eider man and Perry Lee Miller, both of State\u2019s Attorneys Appellate Service Commission, of counsel), for the People."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "In re J.W.M., a Minor (The People of the State of Illinois, Petitioner-Appellee, v. J.W.M., Respondent-Appellant).\nFourth District\nNo. 4 \u2014 83\u20140801\nOpinion filed May 9, 1984.\nDaniel D. Yuhas and Janet Sinder, both of State Appellate Defender\u2019s Officer, of Springfield, for appellant.\nThomas J. Difanis, State\u2019s Attorney, of Urbana (Robert J. Eider man and Perry Lee Miller, both of State\u2019s Attorneys Appellate Service Commission, of counsel), for the People."
  },
  "file_name": "1036-01",
  "first_page_order": 1058,
  "last_page_order": 1059
}