{
  "id": 5345348,
  "name": "Shirley Mitchell, Plaintiff-Appellant-(Kenneth Mitchell, Plaintiff,) v. White Motor Company, Defendant-Appellee-(Charles Landenheim et al., Exrs. of the Estate of John Lanin, Deceased, Defendants.)",
  "name_abbreviation": "Mitchell v. White Motor Co.",
  "decision_date": "1973-08-27",
  "docket_number": "No. 73-126",
  "first_page": "872",
  "last_page": "874",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "13 Ill. App. 3d 872"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "70 C 652",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Cow.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "352 F. Supp. 929",
      "category": "reporters:federal",
      "reporter": "F. Supp.",
      "case_ids": [
        3557487
      ],
      "year": 1973,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/f-supp/352/0929-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 254,
    "char_count": 3222,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.767,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.0873401050065135e-07,
      "percentile": 0.5642900416201871
    },
    "sha256": "55aa4c8e2481c5862eacefecf8cd07a18c3fb07f785cd9106828d4ad8a081983",
    "simhash": "1:e4ef139fa98c273b",
    "word_count": 520
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:56:28.394088+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Shirley Mitchell, Plaintiff-Appellant\u2014(Kenneth Mitchell, Plaintiff,) v. White Motor Company, Defendant-Appellee\u2014(Charles Landenheim et al., Exrs. of the Estate of John Lanin, Deceased, Defendants.)"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE EBERSPACHER\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nThis action was brought in the circuit court of St. Clair County by Shirley and Kenneth Mitchell, husband and wife, for damages arising from injuries sustained by Kenneth Mitchell when the hood of a truck manufactured by defendant White Motor Company fell upon him. The complaint was filed more than two years and less than five years after the alleged injury to the husband. In Count One of the complaint, Shirley Mitchell seeks to recover from White Motor Company for loss of her husband\u2019s services and consortium resulting from her husband\u2019s injuries, based upon principles of strict tort liability. (Count Two is not involved in this appeal.)\nUpon motion, the trial court dismissed Count One of the complaint and entered judgment against Shirley Mitchell and in favor of White Motor Company on the ground that her claim is barred by the statute of limitations, from which this appeal is taken. No questions are raised on the pleadings, and a finding pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 304(a) was entered.\nThe sole issue presented is whether a wife\u2019s cause of action for damages for loss of her husband's services and consortium resulting from personal injuries sustained by him is governed by the two-year statute of limitations application to \u201cactions for damages for an injury to the person\u201d (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1967, ch. 83, par. 15) or the five-year statute of limitations applicable to actions \u201cto recover damages for an injury done to property, real or personal, * * * and all other civil actions not otherwise provided for.\u201d Ill. Rev. Stat. 1967, ch. 83, par. 16.\nThe identical issue and contentions of the parties has not been passed upon by a reviewing court of this State, however, the identical issue and the same contentions in regard thereto have recently been considered and resolved in two Illinois United States District Courts, in the cases of Johnson v. Hi-Way Dispatch, Inc., (E. D. Ill. 1972), 352 F. Supp. 929, and Hockett v. American Airlines, Inc. (N.D. Ill. 1973), No. 70 C 652, decided May 7, 1973, (F. Supp.). Both cases applied what was considered to be the applicable Illinois law, and arrived at the conclusion that an action for loss of consortium is subject to the five-year Statute of Limitations which governs \u201call civil actions not otherwise provided for\u201d, and falls outside the scope of the two-year limitation period. We so hold as to both the alleged loss of consortium and loss of the husband\u2019s services.\nAgreeing with the holdings and reasoning of those decisions on the issue here involved we therefore reverse the order of dismissal and judgment entered thereon, and remand this cause for further proceedings.\nReversed and remanded.\nCREBS and G. MORAN, JJ., concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE EBERSPACHER"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "John E. Norton, Professional Corporation, of Belleville, (Edward J. Kionka, of counsel,) for appellant.",
      "Brady, Donovan & Hatch, of Belleville, (Harold Donovan and Dennis Rose, of counsel,) for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Shirley Mitchell, Plaintiff-Appellant\u2014(Kenneth Mitchell, Plaintiff,) v. White Motor Company, Defendant-Appellee\u2014(Charles Landenheim et al., Exrs. of the Estate of John Lanin, Deceased, Defendants.)\n(No. 73-126;\nFifth District \u2014\nAugust 27, 1973.\nJohn E. Norton, Professional Corporation, of Belleville, (Edward J. Kionka, of counsel,) for appellant.\nBrady, Donovan & Hatch, of Belleville, (Harold Donovan and Dennis Rose, of counsel,) for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0872-01",
  "first_page_order": 894,
  "last_page_order": 896
}