{
  "id": 3610719,
  "name": "THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PHILLIP SMITH, Defendant-Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "People v. Smith",
  "decision_date": "1987-08-03",
  "docket_number": "Nos. 85-1884, 85-1903 cons.",
  "first_page": "156",
  "last_page": "157",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "159 Ill. App. 3d 156"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "421 N.E.2d 189",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "85 Ill. 2d 92",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. 2d",
      "case_ids": [
        5469128
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-2d/85/0092-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "401 N.E.2d 644",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.2d",
      "year": 1981,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "81 Ill. App. 3d 525",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App. 3d",
      "case_ids": [
        3231515
      ],
      "year": 1981,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app-3d/81/0525-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 243,
    "char_count": 3399,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.801,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.2058340068252346e-07,
      "percentile": 0.5947671080437508
    },
    "sha256": "80144de28430d4ed7997c2f50d83c35e95c726d27b4c082adf13c292e890a15e",
    "simhash": "1:8a27cb5f64db76d7",
    "word_count": 559
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:36:20.000303+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PHILLIP SMITH, Defendant-Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "JUSTICE O\u2019CONNOR\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nThe defendant was arrested on January 11, 1985, and charged with possession of a stolen motor vehicle (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 95\u00bd, par. 4 \u2014 103). Following a bench trial, the defendant was found guilty and sentenced to six years in prison. The defendant claims on appeal that section 4 \u2014 103 of the Vehicle Code under which he was sentenced is unconstitutional.\nThe defendant points out that the offense of possession of a stolen motor vehicle is a Class 2 felony, while the offense of theft (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 38, par. 16 \u2014 1) is a Class 3 felony. The defendant argues that because possession of a stolen motor vehicle is a lesser included offense of theft of a motor vehicle, it is unconstitutional for the former to be punishable more severely than the latter.\nAs support for this position, the defendant cites People v. Cramer (1980) , 81 Ill. App. 3d 525, 401 N.E.2d 644, rev\u2019d on other grounds (1981) , 85 Ill. 2d 92, 421 N.E.2d 189. There, the appellate court held that because all the elements of the offense of possession of a stolen motor vehicle are contained in the offense of theft, possession of a stolen motor vehicle was a lesser included offense of theft.\nThe defendant\u2019s argument fails to take into consideration the fact that the statute under which Cramer was decided made even repeated violations of section 4 \u2014 103 a Class 4 felony. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1977, ch. 95\u00bd, par. 4 \u2014 108.) Subsequently, section 4 \u2014 103 was amended to provide that a first conviction for the offense of possession of a stolen motor vehicle was a Class 4 felony and subsequent convictions were Class 3 felonies. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 95\u00bd, par. 4 \u2014 103(b).) In 1984, the legislature amended section 4 \u2014 103 again (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 95\u00bd, par. 4 \u2014 103), reclassifying an initial conviction for possession of a stolen motor vehicle as a Class 2 felony. The penalties for various other vehicle-related criminal offenses were also increased in the amendatory statute. (See Pub. Act 83 \u2014 1473, eff. Jan. 1, 1985.) The amendment to section 4 \u2014 103, by imposing a more severe penalty for possession of a stolen motor vehicle than that imposed for felony theft, demonstrated a legislative intent that possession of a stolen motor vehicle be considered as a separate, more serious offense and not as a lesser included offense of theft. The legislature could properly make such an evaluation. Thus, the defendant\u2019s argument that the statute provides a disproportionately more serious sentence for a lesser included offense than provided for the greater offense is without merit.\nAccordingly, the judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed. As part of our judgment, we grant the State\u2019s request that defendant be assessed $50 as costs for this appeal.\nJudgment affirmed.\nQUINLAN, P.J., and BUCKLEY, J., concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "JUSTICE O\u2019CONNOR"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "James J. Doherty, Public Defender, of Chicago (Nicolette Katsivalis, Assistant Public Defender, of counsel), for appellant.",
      "Richard M. Daley, State\u2019s Attorney, of Chicago (Thomas V. Gainer, Jr., Sharon L. Gaull, and Robert M. Podlasek, Assistant State\u2019s Attorneys, of counsel), for the People."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PHILLIP SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.\nFirst District (1st Division)\nNos. 85 \u2014 1884, 85 \u2014 1903 cons.\nOpinion filed August 3, 1987.\nRehearing denied August 19, 1987.\nJames J. Doherty, Public Defender, of Chicago (Nicolette Katsivalis, Assistant Public Defender, of counsel), for appellant.\nRichard M. Daley, State\u2019s Attorney, of Chicago (Thomas V. Gainer, Jr., Sharon L. Gaull, and Robert M. Podlasek, Assistant State\u2019s Attorneys, of counsel), for the People."
  },
  "file_name": "0156-01",
  "first_page_order": 178,
  "last_page_order": 179
}