{
  "id": 2514400,
  "name": "The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lavon Logan, Defendant-Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "People v. Logan",
  "decision_date": "1974-03-28",
  "docket_number": "No. 11898",
  "first_page": "1025",
  "last_page": "1026",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "17 Ill. App. 3d 1025"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "227 N.E.2d 779",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 183,
    "char_count": 1991,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.718,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 8.490011498157266e-08,
      "percentile": 0.4861341336888753
    },
    "sha256": "3124e3cdccd7d5d4b0615ab4656b5bb5eab3320de3d5022cb3676928950d4300",
    "simhash": "1:7f9b7e2da20cfe99",
    "word_count": 336
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:35:57.081722+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lavon Logan, Defendant-Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. JUSTICE SIMKINS\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nThe defendant-appellant, Lavon Logan, was indicted in the circuit court of Adams County for the crime of intimidation, an offense defin\u00e9d in Ill. Rev. Stat. 1969, ch. 38, par. 12-6. The jury returned a verdict of guilty and on January 28, 1972, defendant was sentenced to an indeterminate term of 2 to 4 years.\nOn appeal defendant urges that he was not proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and that the sentence imposed should be modified to conform to the penalty provisions of Ill. Rev. Stat., 1972 Supp., ch. 38, par. 1005 \u2014 8\u20141(c)(4), Ill. Rev. Stat. 1971, ch. 38, par. 12 \u2014 6 and Ill. Rev. Stat., 1972 Supp., ch. 38, par. 12 \u2014 6. Defendant additionally contends that he was denied equal protection of the law because the elements of the offense for which he was convicted are identical with the elements of the offense of communicating with jurors and witnesses (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1969, ch. 38, par. 32 \u2014 4) and since there are different penalties prescribed in the two sections of the statutes.\nThe People filed no brief in support of the trial court\u2019s judgment, and this places the reviewing court in the role of advocate as well as judge (People v. Spinelli, 83 IlI.App.2d 391, 227 N.E.2d 779). Lack of appearance by the appellee permits reversal of the judgment with no discussion of the merits. It is also true that if it would be manifestly unjust to reverse pro forma the court, in its discretion, may consider the appeal on its merits. After examining the record and the issues presented, we have determined that pro forma reversal is the appropriate action.\nThe judgment is reversed.\nTRAPP, P. J., and CRAVEN, J., concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. JUSTICE SIMKINS"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "John F. McNichoIs, Deputy Defender, of Springfield, (J. Daniel Stewart, Assistant Appellate Defender, of counsel), for appellant.",
      "No appearance for the People."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lavon Logan, Defendant-Appellant.\n(No. 11898;\nFourth District\nMarch 28, 1974.\nJohn F. McNichoIs, Deputy Defender, of Springfield, (J. Daniel Stewart, Assistant Appellate Defender, of counsel), for appellant.\nNo appearance for the People."
  },
  "file_name": "1025-01",
  "first_page_order": 1047,
  "last_page_order": 1048
}