{
  "id": 2473576,
  "name": "JUANITA BAINTER et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CHALMERS TOWNSHIP, Defendant-Appellee",
  "name_abbreviation": "Bainter v. Chalmers Township",
  "decision_date": "1990-06-08",
  "docket_number": "No. 3\u201489\u20140537",
  "first_page": "540",
  "last_page": "541",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "198 Ill. App. 3d 540"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "516 N.E.2d 379",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "162 Ill. App. 3d 510",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App. 3d",
      "case_ids": [
        3507776
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app-3d/162/0510-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "532 N.E.2d 914",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "178 Ill. App. 3d 42",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App. 3d",
      "case_ids": [
        2433308
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app-3d/178/0042-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "530 N.E.2d 284",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.2d",
      "weight": 3,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "285"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "175 Ill. App. 3d 768",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App. 3d",
      "case_ids": [
        3554322
      ],
      "weight": 3,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "771"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app-3d/175/0768-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 197,
    "char_count": 2275,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.753,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.6157678699256722e-07,
      "percentile": 0.6864027593886748
    },
    "sha256": "517a9a9ad8bbd0a127173c304946b33036698fb5cf7c08adf80b4eb89923ba86",
    "simhash": "1:21ab3ace4cdc271c",
    "word_count": 370
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:49:28.995518+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "JUANITA BAINTER et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CHALMERS TOWNSHIP, Defendant-Appellee."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "JUSTICE STOUDER\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nThe plaintiffs, Juanita and Lynn Bainter, appeal from the trial court\u2019s granting the defendant\u2019s, Chalmers Township\u2019s, motion to dismiss count V of their complaint. This appeal involves a collision between the Bainters\u2019 automobile and a school bus. The collision occurred on Timberhill Road in Chalmers Township (the township), a township of McDonough County, Illinois. The trial court granted the township\u2019s motion to dismiss count V of the complaint for failure to state a cause of action relying on this court\u2019s decision in Havens v. Harris Township (1988), 175 Ill. App. 3d 768, 530 N.E.2d 284. The trial court, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 304(a), made its judgment final and appealable. (107 Ill. 2d R. 304(a).) We affirm.\nOn appeal, the Bainters ask this court to reverse our holding in Havens or find the instant case distinguishable from Havens. The Bainters further request that this court follow the reasoning in Long v. Friesland (1988), 178 Ill. App. 3d 42, 532 N.E.2d 914, wherein the court found the clearing of brush from alongside a road to be a ministerial act.\nWe will continue to adhere to our decision in Havens. A township has no common law duty to widen roads, smooth gravel, erect signs, or mow weeds (Havens v. Harris Township (1988), 175 Ill. App. 3d 768, 530 N.E.2d 284), and a public official has an absolute immunity from lawsuits challenging his acts of judgment or discretion. (Kirchgessner v. County of Tazewell (1987), 162 Ill. App. 3d 510, 516 N.E.2d 379.) Absent a statutory or common law duty, moreover, it is up to the township\u2019s discretion to decide whether road improvements, such as clearing the brush in the instant case, were necessary. Havens, 175 Ill. App. 3d at 771, 530 N.E.2d at 285.\nAccordingly, the judgment of the circuit court of McDonough County is affirmed.\nAffirmed.\nHEIPLE, P.J., and SCOTT, J., concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "JUSTICE STOUDER"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Charles N. Edmiston, of Kanoski & Associates, of Rushville (Ronald Kanoski, of counsel), for appellants.",
      "Gregory Cerulo, of Quinn, Johnston, Henderson & Pretorius, of Peoria (Brian P. Mack, of counsel), for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "JUANITA BAINTER et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CHALMERS TOWNSHIP, Defendant-Appellee.\nThird District\nNo. 3\u201489\u20140537\nOpinion filed June 8, 1990.\nCharles N. Edmiston, of Kanoski & Associates, of Rushville (Ronald Kanoski, of counsel), for appellants.\nGregory Cerulo, of Quinn, Johnston, Henderson & Pretorius, of Peoria (Brian P. Mack, of counsel), for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0540-01",
  "first_page_order": 562,
  "last_page_order": 563
}