{
  "id": 2943247,
  "name": "The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Carroll Huard, Defendant-Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "People v. Huard",
  "decision_date": "1974-10-01",
  "docket_number": "No. 73-215",
  "first_page": "198",
  "last_page": "198",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "22 Ill. App. 3d 198"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "213 N.E.2d 765",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "67 Ill.App.2d 292",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App. 2d",
      "case_ids": [
        5289735
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app-2d/67/0292-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "224 N.E.2d 284",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "80 Ill. App.2d 182",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App. 2d",
      "case_ids": [
        2563124
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app-2d/80/0182-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "235 N.E.2d 295",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "92 Ill.App.2d 201",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App. 2d",
      "case_ids": [
        5322368
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app-2d/92/0201-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 154,
    "char_count": 1523,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.727,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.08594535820428141
    },
    "sha256": "b4e04ee4a82bc64bb529e454c3a14deb284ebb02ba1888521e2814722b415bb5",
    "simhash": "1:a4034ddd749e6aa0",
    "word_count": 241
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:04:13.341458+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Carroll Huard, Defendant-Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. JUSTICE CREBS\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nOn April 13, 1973, Robert Carroll Huard was charged by information with the offense of deceptive practice. Subsequently defendant pled guilty to the charge and was sentenced to 1 year in accordance with plea negotiations. Defendant appeals on the grounds of defective information, failure to sufficiently inform him of right to counsel, alleged violations of Supreme Court Rule 402 (Ill. Rev. Stat., ch. 110A, par. 402) and improper sentencing. Defendant has been released on bond.\nDefendant first contends that the information is fatally defective because it does not allege intent to defraud as required in People v. Greene, 92 Ill.App.2d 201, 235 N.E.2d 295; People v. Samples, 80 Ill. App.2d 182, 224 N.E.2d 284; and People v. Billingsley, 67 Ill.App.2d 292, 213 N.E.2d 765.\nWe also note that the statute (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1971, ch. 38, par. 17 \u2014 1) commences as follows: \u201cA person commits a deceptive practice when, with intent to defraud * *\nWe agree that it is necessary to allege intent to defraud. In view of this holding it is unnecessary to discuss the other contentions.\nJudgment reversed.\nG. MORAN, P. J., and EBERSPACHER, J., concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. JUSTICE CREBS"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Robert E. Farrell and James Streicker, of State Appellate Defenders Office, of Chicago, for appellant.",
      "Frank H. Schniederjon, State\u2019s Attorney, of Effingham, for the People."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Carroll Huard, Defendant-Appellant.\n(No. 73-215;\nFifth District\nOctober 1, 1974.\nRobert E. Farrell and James Streicker, of State Appellate Defenders Office, of Chicago, for appellant.\nFrank H. Schniederjon, State\u2019s Attorney, of Effingham, for the People."
  },
  "file_name": "0198-01",
  "first_page_order": 220,
  "last_page_order": 220
}