{
  "id": 2506900,
  "name": "The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Douglas Hardwick, Defendant-Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "People v. Hardwick",
  "decision_date": "1974-10-31",
  "docket_number": "No. 12539",
  "first_page": "332",
  "last_page": "333",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "23 Ill. App. 3d 332"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "227 N.E.2d 779",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "83 Ill.App.2d 391",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App. 2d",
      "case_ids": [
        2556690,
        2555948
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app-2d/83/0391-02",
        "/ill-app-2d/83/0391-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "293 N.E.2d 136",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "9 Ill.App.3d 797",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App. 3d",
      "case_ids": [
        2850255
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app-3d/9/0797-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "298 N.E.2d 864",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "11 Ill.App.3d 416",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App. 3d",
      "case_ids": [
        2932237,
        2934759
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app-3d/11/0416-02",
        "/ill-app-3d/11/0416-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "288 N.E.2d 518",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "7 Ill.App.3d 696",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App. 3d",
      "case_ids": [
        2669375
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app-3d/7/0696-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 168,
    "char_count": 1970,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.724,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 9.505882454708161e-08,
      "percentile": 0.5210958245055985
    },
    "sha256": "d551b4d527629f856b63239ba2edbd1f4af5670dbcfd3f4360b5cabe28d4bbf1",
    "simhash": "1:6eaa79c5ecc535c6",
    "word_count": 305
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:19:43.775116+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Douglas Hardwick, Defendant-Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. JUSTICE SIMKINS\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nDefendant appeals from an order of the circuit court of Jersey County revoking his probation and transferring him to the custody of the Illinois Department of Corrections, Juvenile Division. Defendant raises the' following issues: (1) Whether the trial court erred in continuing the hearing on probation revocation without giving proper notice, (2) Whether the trial court erred in permitting the State to amend the probation revocation petition without giving defendant proper notice or proper time to prepare a defense, (3) Whether additional probation-revocation charges can be placed against defendant after the initial petition to revoke is filed, (4) Whether the court erred in allowing the State to present its case at the probation-revocation hearing piecemeal and not in proper sequence, and (5) Whether the court erred in allowing the introduction of evidence regarding an illegal search and seizure.\nThe State\u2019s Attorney in this case has neither filed a brief nor argued the cause in this court. Therefore, review of the merits of the issues raised by defendant would necessitate this court assuming the position of being an advocate for one party contrary to well established principles of judicial review. People v. Dossett, 7 Ill.App.3d 696, 288 N.E.2d 518 (4th Dist.); People v. Holland, 11 Ill.App.3d 416, 298 N.E.2d 864; People v. French, 9 Ill.App.3d 797, 293 N.E.2d 136; and People v. Spinelli, 83 Ill.App.2d 391, 227 N.E.2d 779.\nAccordingly, the order of the circuit court of Jersey county revoking defendant\u2019s probation is reversed pro forma, and the cause is remanded for a new probation-revocation hearing.\nReversed and remanded.\nSMITH, P. J., and TRAPP, J., concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. JUSTICE SIMKINS"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Phillip D. Moore, of Jerseyville, for appellant.",
      "No appearance for the People."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Douglas Hardwick, Defendant-Appellant.\n(No. 12539;\nFourth District\nOctober 31, 1974.\nPhillip D. Moore, of Jerseyville, for appellant.\nNo appearance for the People."
  },
  "file_name": "0332-01",
  "first_page_order": 356,
  "last_page_order": 357
}