{
  "id": 5306576,
  "name": "James O. Cox, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Anthony C. Abbington, Defendant-Appellee",
  "name_abbreviation": "Cox v. Abbington",
  "decision_date": "1974-11-21",
  "docket_number": "No. 59307",
  "first_page": "220",
  "last_page": "221",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "24 Ill. App. 3d 220"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "317 N.E.2d 505",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "58 Ill.2d 159",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. 2d",
      "case_ids": [
        2953047
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-2d/58/0159-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "301 N.E.2d 166",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "13 Ill.App.3d 872",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App. 3d",
      "case_ids": [
        5345348
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app-3d/13/0872-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "299 N.E.2d 479",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "12 Ill.App.3d 887",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App. 3d",
      "case_ids": [
        2857412
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app-3d/12/0887-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 217,
    "char_count": 2606,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.745,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.676830387708631e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3560416070589444
    },
    "sha256": "59650538d5ffa255767d0ee8e2d77652efc376b6cb619c62067a0edd3ebf67b4",
    "simhash": "1:19cf7bb403917671",
    "word_count": 443
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:53:16.970085+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "James O. Cox, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Anthony C. Abbington, Defendant-Appellee."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. JUSTICE DEMPSEY\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nMildred Cox was a passenger in a bus which was brought to a stop because of an accident which had occurred on the highway. The defendant, Anthony Abbington, drove his vehicle into the stopped bus and Mrs. Cox was injured. Her husband, the plaintiff, James Cox, filed a complaint against Abbington for the medical expenses he had paid on behalf of his wife and for the loss of her consortium.\nMrs. Cox was injured on May 14, 1969, and her husband\u2019s complaint was filed in January 1973. Abbington moved to dismiss the complaint for the reason that it had not been filed within 2 years of her injury. The trial court sustained the motion. Cox appeals and contends that a 5-year, rather than a 2-year, period of limitation is applicable to his cause of action.\nAbbington relies on section 14 of \u201cAn Act in regard to limitations\u201d (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1971, ch. 83, par. 15) and on Kolar v. City of Chicago, 12 Ill.App.3d 887, 299 N.E.2d 479. Cox relies on section 15 of the Act and on Mitchell v. White Motor Co., 13 Ill.App.3d 872, 301 N.E.2d 166. Section 14 provides for a 2-year period of limitation in personal injury actions. Section 15 states that there shall be a 5-year period of limitation in certain enumerated actions and for all other civil actions not expressly governed by other statutes. Abbington argues that Cox\u2019s action arose as a consequence of his wife\u2019s personal injuries. Cox responds that his claims come within the ambit of section 15 because their limitation period is not specifically covered by another statute.\nKolar, decided in June 1973, held that the 2-year statute of limitations barred a husband\u2019s suit for loss of consortium and medical expenses incurred by him as a result of his wife\u2019s injuries, which occurred more than 2 years but less than 5 years before his suit was filed. The opinion in Mitchell, which was filed in August 1973, held the opposite. The Mitchell court was unaware of the Kolar decision and stated that no State court in Illinois had ever passed upon the issue.\nThe issue has now been resolved. The Supreme Court overruled Kolar and affirmed Mitchell. (Mitchell v. White Motor Co. (1974), 58 Ill.2d 159, 317 N.E.2d 505.) The dismissal of Cox\u2019s complaint must, therefore, be vacated.\nReversed and remanded.\nMcNAMARA, P. J., and McGLOON, J., concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. JUSTICE DEMPSEY"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Allen J. Sucherman, of Chicago, for appellant.",
      "Gates W. Clancy and James S. Mills, both of Chicago, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "James O. Cox, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Anthony C. Abbington, Defendant-Appellee.\n(No. 59307;\nFirst District (3rd Division)\nNovember 21, 1974.\nAllen J. Sucherman, of Chicago, for appellant.\nGates W. Clancy and James S. Mills, both of Chicago, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0220-01",
  "first_page_order": 244,
  "last_page_order": 245
}