{
  "id": 2843078,
  "name": "The People of the State of Illinois, Appellee, v. Ralph Page, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "People v. Page",
  "decision_date": "1972-02-02",
  "docket_number": "No. 71-20",
  "first_page": "819",
  "last_page": "820",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "3 Ill. App. 3d 819"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "395 U.S. 238",
      "category": "reporters:federal",
      "reporter": "U.S.",
      "case_ids": [
        1771759
      ],
      "weight": 3,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/us/395/0238-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 167,
    "char_count": 1937,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.762,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 6.380125665320789e-08,
      "percentile": 0.39278525504768813
    },
    "sha256": "8c8581b479abb013de55845fbfef7ad72c8987a42057d9edc6018a3c74803b4e",
    "simhash": "1:296867441d140ea1",
    "word_count": 309
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:53:03.474127+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The People of the State of Illinois, Appellee, v. Ralph Page, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM:\nThis was a prosecution by indictment for the offense of burglary. The defendant entered a plea of guilty and was sentenced to one year and nine months probation, with the first nine months of the sentence to be imprisonment at the Illinois State Penal Farm at Vandalia.\nThe sole issue presented in this appeal was whether the defendant was advised of the privilege against compulsory self-incrimination prior to entering his plea of guilty. Defendant cites and relies upon Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 23 L.Ed.2d 274, 89 S.Ct. 1709. Other than the privilege against self-incrimination the admonition given defendant by the trial court was full and complete.\nTwo recent opinions of the Illinois Supreme Court have resolved the identical contention made by defendant in this appeal. In People v. Reeves (No. 43314, Sept. 1971) (Ill.2d) (N.E.2d), our Supreme Court said: \u201cWe find nothing in Boykin which compels specific admonitions and waivers with respect to the several constitutional rights\u2019 to which McCarthy refers but does not enumerate.\u201d In People v. Arndt (Nos. 43995, 43996, Sept 1971) (Ill.2d) (N.E.2d), our Supreme Court said, \u201cThe Supreme Court itself has not interpreted the Boykin case in the literal way in which the defendant reads it,\u201d and pointed out that Boykin requires that the record must affirmatively disclose that the plea was accepted after it was \u201cunderstandingly and voluntarily\u201d entered.\nWe find that the record in the present case affirmatively discloses that defendant\u2019s plea of guilty was made understandingly and voluntarily, and on the basis of the Reeves and Arndt cases we affirm the judgment of the trial court.\nJudgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Paul Bradley, of Defender Project, of Mt. Vernon, for appellant.",
      "R. W. Griffith, Jr., State\u2019s Attorney, of Edwardsville, for the People."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "The People of the State of Illinois, Appellee, v. Ralph Page, Appellant.\n(No. 71-20;\nFifth District\nFebruary 2, 1972.\nPaul Bradley, of Defender Project, of Mt. Vernon, for appellant.\nR. W. Griffith, Jr., State\u2019s Attorney, of Edwardsville, for the People."
  },
  "file_name": "0819-01",
  "first_page_order": 839,
  "last_page_order": 840
}