{
  "id": 411706,
  "name": "THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MANUEL RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "People v. Ramirez",
  "decision_date": "2000-02-22",
  "docket_number": "No. 1 \u2014 98 \u2014 3379",
  "first_page": "1",
  "last_page": "3",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "312 Ill. App. 3d 1"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "369 N.E.2d 1238",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.2d",
      "year": 1977,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "68 Ill. 2d 287",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. 2d",
      "case_ids": [
        5810481
      ],
      "year": 1977,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "292-93"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-2d/68/0287-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "579 N.E.2d 336",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.2d",
      "year": 1991,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "144 Ill. 2d 108",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. 2d",
      "case_ids": [
        5592162
      ],
      "year": 1991,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "127-28"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-2d/144/0108-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "658 N.E.2d 413",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.2d",
      "year": 1995,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "167 Ill. 2d 483",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. 2d",
      "case_ids": [
        222798
      ],
      "year": 1995,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "500"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-2d/167/0483-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "370 N.E.2d 537",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.2d",
      "year": 1977,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "69 Ill. 2d 73",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. 2d",
      "case_ids": [
        5455075
      ],
      "year": 1977,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "79"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-2d/69/0073-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "392 U.S. 1",
      "category": "reporters:federal",
      "reporter": "U.S.",
      "case_ids": [
        6167798
      ],
      "weight": 3,
      "year": 1968,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "22",
          "parenthetical": "Steven, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part, joined by Sauder, Ginsburg and Breyer, JJ."
        },
        {
          "page": "906-07",
          "parenthetical": "Steven, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part, joined by Sauder, Ginsburg and Breyer, JJ."
        },
        {
          "page": "1880",
          "parenthetical": "Steven, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part, joined by Sauder, Ginsburg and Breyer, JJ."
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/us/392/0001-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "528 U.S. 119",
      "category": "reporters:federal",
      "reporter": "U.S.",
      "case_ids": [
        9476180
      ],
      "weight": 3,
      "year": 2000,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "127-28"
        },
        {
          "page": "578-79"
        },
        {
          "page": "677-78"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/us/528/0119-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "712 N.E.2d 883",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.2d",
      "year": 1999,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "305 Ill. App. 3d 517",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App. 3d",
      "case_ids": [
        1208133
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1999,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "523"
        },
        {
          "page": "527"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app-3d/305/0517-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "645 N.E.2d 195",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.2d",
      "year": 1994,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "163 Ill. 2d 302",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. 2d",
      "case_ids": [
        477765
      ],
      "year": 1994,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "310"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-2d/163/0302-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "675 N.E.2d 604",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.2d",
      "year": 1996,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "175 Ill. 2d 60",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. 2d",
      "case_ids": [
        295758
      ],
      "year": 1996,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "64"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-2d/175/0060-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "686 N.E.2d 603",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.2d",
      "year": 1997,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "292 Ill. App. 3d 1026",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App. 3d",
      "case_ids": [
        1725085
      ],
      "year": 1997,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "1029"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app-3d/292/1026-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "390 N.E.2d 1364",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.2d",
      "year": 1979,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "73 Ill. App. 3d 160",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App. 3d",
      "case_ids": [
        3260769
      ],
      "year": 1979,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "165"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app-3d/73/0160-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "414 N.E.2d 274",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.2d",
      "year": 1980,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "92 Ill. App. 3d 71",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App. 3d",
      "case_ids": [
        5533108
      ],
      "year": 1980,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "73"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app-3d/92/0071-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "700 N.E.2d 168",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.2d",
      "year": 1998,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "298 Ill. App. 3d 943",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App. 3d",
      "case_ids": [
        1073605
      ],
      "year": 1998,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "950-51"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app-3d/298/0943-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "221 N.E.2d 256",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.2d",
      "year": 1966,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "35 Ill. 2d 501",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. 2d",
      "case_ids": [
        5380332
      ],
      "year": 1966,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "503-04"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-2d/35/0501-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 386,
    "char_count": 4948,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.75,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.263068351164725e-08,
      "percentile": 0.33058935096216036
    },
    "sha256": "312837f0231b415fdb1e19362b28e16d701fc92c8c76303ea3900bbcd7505c85",
    "simhash": "1:609c20e97bc6df57",
    "word_count": 806
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:51:04.567640+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MANUEL RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "JUSTICE GALLAGHER\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nDefendant Manuel Ramirez was charged with one count each of attempted first degree murder and aggravated battery with a firearm, and two counts each of armed violence and aggravated battery. Defendant unsuccessfully moved to suppress evidence. Following a stipulated bench trial, defendant was acquitted of both counts of armed violence, but he was found guilty of attempted first degree murder, aggravated battery with a firearm, and both counts of aggravated battery. He was sentenced to a prison term of eight years for attempted first degree murder only. On appeal, defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress because there was no probable cause and there were no exigent circumstances supporting his warrantless arrest. The State responds that the issues were waived and lack merit.\nDefense counsel orally stated that he wished to preserve his right to appeal, without objection by the State to that procedure. Cf. People v. Whitehead, 35 Ill. 2d 501, 503-04, 221 N.E.2d 256 (1966); People v. Shields, 298 Ill. App. 3d 943, 950-51, 700 N.E.2d 168 (1998); People v. Moore, 92 Ill. App. 3d 71, 73, 414 N.E.2d 274 (1980); People v. Redmond, 73 Ill. App. 3d 160, 165, 390 N.E.2d 1364 (1979). We therefore decline to treat the issues as waived.\nDefendant contends that de novo review is applicable (see People v. Billingslea, 292 Ill. App. 3d 1026, 1029, 686 N.E.2d 603 (1997)), but he implicitly disputes the credibility of Officer Reyes\u2019 testimony that defendant\u2019s sister and mother consented voluntarily to the officers\u2019 entry into defendant\u2019s home. We therefore apply the more deferential standard of review which scrutinizes only whether the trial court\u2019s denial of the motion to suppress was manifestly erroneous. See People v. Krueger, 175 Ill. 2d 60, 64, 675 N.E.2d 604 (1996); People v. James, 163 Ill. 2d 302, 310, 645 N.E.2d 195 (1994); People v. Williams, 305 Ill. App. 3d 517, 523, 712 N.E.2d 883 (1999).\nHere, when Officer O\u2019Brien tried to stop the car in which defendant was a passenger for a traffic violation, the car initially sped away. When the car stopped, defendant fled on foot. His companions stated that he fled because he was wanted for a shooting somewhere on Archer Avenue. These circumstances established the requisite reasonable suspicion for an investigative stop of defendant. See Illinois v. Wardlow, 528 U.S. 119, 127-28, 145 L. Ed. 2d 570, 578-79, 120 S. Ct. 673, 677-78 (2000); Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 22, 20 L. Ed. 2d 889, 906-07, 88 S. Ct. 1868, 1880 (1968) (Steven, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part, joined by Sauder, Ginsburg and Breyer, JJ.); People v. McGowan, 69 Ill. 2d 73, 79, 370 N.E.2d 537 (1977).\nNeighbors directed the officers to a particular two-story building following the traffic stop and defendant\u2019s flight. Officer Reyes testified that defendant\u2019s sister opened the front door of the two-flat and allowed the officers to enter. Officer Reyes further testified that, when the officers reached the second floor of the building, defendant\u2019s mother allowed them to search that apartment. When Officers Reyes and Taylor found defendant hiding in the bathroom of the second-floor apartment, defendant told the officers that he knew they were looking for him in connection with the shooting. Thus, defendant essentially told the officers that he was wanted, and probable cause then existed for the officers to arrest him. See generally People v. Sims, 167 Ill. 2d 483, 500, 658 N.E.2d 413 (1995); People v. Edwards, 144 Ill. 2d 108, 127-28, 579 N.E.2d 336 (1991); People v. Blitz, 68 Ill. 2d 287, 292-93, 369 N.E.2d 1238 (1977). The officers were not required to obtain a warrant because there was evidence that they were given voluntary consent to enter the residence (see Williams, 305 Ill. App. 3d at 527), and the trial court explicitly found that the officers were credible and that they gained entry by consent. Given the totality of the circumstances in this case, the trial court\u2019s denial of defendant\u2019s motion to suppress was not manifestly erroneous.\nFinally, the State filed a motion, which is still pending, to dismiss the appeal based upon defendant\u2019s failure to file a transcript, which defendant has since filed. Accordingly, the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed, and the State\u2019s motion to dismiss is denied. As part of our judgment, we grant the State\u2019s request to assess defendant $100 as costs for this appeal.\nAffirmed.\nO\u2019HARA FROSSARD, EJ., and RAKOWSKI, J., concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "JUSTICE GALLAGHER"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Michael A. Unger, of Chicago, for appellant.",
      "Richard A. Devine, State\u2019s Attorney, of Chicago (Renee Goldfarb, Mary L. Boland, Assistant State\u2019s Attorneys, and Prentis L. Johnson, law clerk, of counsel), for the People."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MANUEL RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant.\nFirst District (1st Division)\nNo. 1 \u2014 98 \u2014 3379\nOpinion filed February 22, 2000.\nMichael A. Unger, of Chicago, for appellant.\nRichard A. Devine, State\u2019s Attorney, of Chicago (Renee Goldfarb, Mary L. Boland, Assistant State\u2019s Attorneys, and Prentis L. Johnson, law clerk, of counsel), for the People."
  },
  "file_name": "0001-01",
  "first_page_order": 21,
  "last_page_order": 23
}