{
  "id": 3472406,
  "name": "THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ISAAC E. BAKER, Defendant-Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "People v. Baker",
  "decision_date": "2003-08-22",
  "docket_number": "No. 4-02-0200",
  "first_page": "615",
  "last_page": "616",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "342 Ill. App. 3d 615"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 185,
    "char_count": 2098,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.754,
    "sha256": "e770caebf27f7bd04d873bdd179a4ee0802ca4192361d49eb0b44a5a570d5e92",
    "simhash": "1:c9000c84a056afb4",
    "word_count": 336
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:14:05.196224+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "KNECHT and STEIGMANN, JJ., concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ISAAC E. BAKER, Defendant-Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "JUSTICE McCULLOUGH\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nIn August 1999, defendant, Isaac E. Baker, pleaded guilty to criminal damage to government-supported property not in excess of $500 (720 ILCS 5/21 \u2014 4(l)(a) (West 1998)), and the trial court sentenced him to 24 months\u2019 probation. In August 2000, the State petitioned to revoke probation due to defendant\u2019s failure to report to his probation officer. Following his January 2002 admission to the charge, the trial court in February 2002 resentenced defendant to three years\u2019 imprisonment and ordered defendant to complete a TASC (Treatment Alternatives for Special Clients) program as part of his mandatory supervised release (MSR).\nDefendant appeals, contending the trial court was without authority to order defendant to complete TASC treatment as part of his MSR because that power is granted exclusively to the Prisoner Review Board. The State concedes the error, and we agree.\nTreatment for alcoholism or drug addiction may be ordered as a condition of MSR (20 ILCS 301/45 \u2014 15 (West 2002); 730 ILCS 5/3\u2014 3 \u2014 7(b)(2) (West 2002)), but only the members of the Prisoner Review Board are empowered by statute to determine which conditions will be imposed as part of MSR (730 ILCS 5/3 \u2014 3\u20147(a), 3 \u2014 3\u20141(a)(5) (West 2002)). Since the trial court lacked the authority to impose this condition as a part of its sentence of imprisonment following revocation of probation, we vacate that portion of the sentence. Since defendant raises no other challenge on appeal, the remainder of his sentence is affirmed.\nAffirmed in part and vacated in part.\nKNECHT and STEIGMANN, JJ., concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "JUSTICE McCULLOUGH"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Daniel D. Yuhas and Judith L. Libby, both of State Appellate Defender\u2019s Office, of Springfield, for appellant.",
      "Frank McCartney, State\u2019s Attorney, of Pittsfield (Norbert J. Goetten, Robert J. Biderman, and Denise M. Ambrose, all of State\u2019s Attorneys Appellate Prosecutor\u2019s Office, of counsel), for the People."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ISAAC E. BAKER, Defendant-Appellant.\nFourth District\nNo. 4-02-0200\nOpinion filed August 22, 2003.\nDaniel D. Yuhas and Judith L. Libby, both of State Appellate Defender\u2019s Office, of Springfield, for appellant.\nFrank McCartney, State\u2019s Attorney, of Pittsfield (Norbert J. Goetten, Robert J. Biderman, and Denise M. Ambrose, all of State\u2019s Attorneys Appellate Prosecutor\u2019s Office, of counsel), for the People."
  },
  "file_name": "0615-01",
  "first_page_order": 633,
  "last_page_order": 634
}