{
  "id": 5383719,
  "name": "SUSAN W. REACE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RICHARD H. REACE, Defendant-Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Reace v. Reace",
  "decision_date": "1976-06-09",
  "docket_number": "No. 62254",
  "first_page": "496",
  "last_page": "497",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "39 Ill. App. 3d 496"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "183 N.E.2d 539",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "36 Ill. App. 2d 163",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App. 2d",
      "case_ids": [
        5261159
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app-2d/36/0163-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 170,
    "char_count": 2170,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.859,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.4221297476745874e-07,
      "percentile": 0.6492471182682852
    },
    "sha256": "83f4ea4c65eba547906035665ae20fa1bd3fcb9050d601e51a47b8e2f2107925",
    "simhash": "1:237926318c3fee94",
    "word_count": 350
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:44:11.874495+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "SUSAN W. REACE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RICHARD H. REACE, Defendant-Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. JUSTICE ADESKO\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nDefendant appeals from an order, entered on May 12, 1975, denying defendant\u2019s petition to change and alter an order, entered on April 7, 1975. The latter order, from which defendant also appeals, reads in pertinent part as follows:\n\u201cPlaintiffs custody of the child is confirmed in the mother. Mother shall have exclusive right of general and religious training of the child and Husband shall not interfere in Plaintiffs religious training of the child.\u201d\nIn his petition of May 7,1975, defendant asserted that \u201cthis portion of the order was entered without the understanding of [defendant] Petitioner, although ostensibly by agreement,\u201d that defendant wished to assist in the religious training of the child, and that the order be altered to reflect defendant\u2019s true intention. The order of May 12, 1975, denying defendant\u2019s petition to change and alter, recited that the court had been \u201capprised in the premises\u201d and had \u201cheard arguments of counsel.\u201d The order of April 7,1975, recites that \u201cthe parties [were] represented in Court by counsel and the parties\u2019 minor child [was] represented by a Guardian ad Litem.\u201d\nThis court has not been presented with a complete record on appeal. There is no report of proceedings for either April 7,1975, or May 12,1975. Where an appellant does not bring before a reviewing court a complete report of proceedings, the reviewing court will presume that the omitted report of proceedings justifies the order from which the appeal is taken. (O\u2019Berry v. O\u2019Berry, 36 Ill. App. 2d 163, 183 N.E.2d 539.) Therefore, in the absence of a report of proceedings for either April 7,1975, or for May 12, 1975, the orders of the circuit court of Cook County entered in this case on those dates are affirmed.\nOrders affirmed.\nJOHNSON, P. J., and BURMAN, J., concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. JUSTICE ADESKO"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Patrick J. Leston, of Villa Park, for appellant.",
      "Friedman, Armstrong & Donnelly, of Chicago (Edwin R. Armstrong, James R. Donnelly, and James T. Friedman, of counsel), for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "SUSAN W. REACE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RICHARD H. REACE, Defendant-Appellant.\nFirst District (4th Division)\nNo. 62254\nOpinion filed June 9, 1976.\nPatrick J. Leston, of Villa Park, for appellant.\nFriedman, Armstrong & Donnelly, of Chicago (Edwin R. Armstrong, James R. Donnelly, and James T. Friedman, of counsel), for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0496-01",
  "first_page_order": 524,
  "last_page_order": 525
}