{
  "id": 2524102,
  "name": "Marie Korte et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Alphonse Kalmer et al., Defendants-Appellees-(Bertha Kalmer, Defendant-Counter-Plaintiff-Appellant.)",
  "name_abbreviation": "Korte v. Kalmer",
  "decision_date": "1972-05-12",
  "docket_number": "No. 70-200",
  "first_page": "626",
  "last_page": "627",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "5 Ill. App. 3d 626"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 129,
    "char_count": 1359,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.74,
    "sha256": "e05b93ecba08d7591cfc880e9abcff44b639f388f4ad4dec7610f59125a8942b",
    "simhash": "1:71ea83023366ab63",
    "word_count": 216
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:05:48.814564+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Marie Korte et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Alphonse Kalmer et al., Defendants-Appellees\u2014(Bertha Kalmer, Defendant-Counter-Plaintiff-Appellant.)"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. JUSTICE JONES\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nThis is a partition action brought by two sisters against other brothers and sisters and their mother. The plaintiffs claim that they are joint owners of certain parcels of real estate along with the other parties and that said real estate should be partitioned and divided among them. The defendant, Bertha Kalmer, mother of the other parties claims that she is the fee title holder to said real estate. The court without a jury rendered a verdict for plaintiffs finding that they were in fact joint tenants and that the property should be partitioned. No questions were raised on the pleadings. Defendant Bertha Kalmer appeals.\nWe find that the judgment of the trial court was not against the manifest weight of the evidence, that no error of law appears and that an opinion in this case would have no precedential value.\nWe therefore affirm the judgment of the trial court in compliance with Illinois Supreme Court Rule 23.\nJudgment affirmed.\nG. MORAN, P. J., and EBERSPACHER, J., concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. JUSTICE JONES"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Kinder & Scroggins, of Madison, (William F. Kinder, of counsel,) for appellant.",
      "George B. Griggs, of Carlyle, for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Marie Korte et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Alphonse Kalmer et al., Defendants-Appellees\u2014(Bertha Kalmer, Defendant-Counter-Plaintiff-Appellant.)\n(No. 70-200;\nFifth District\nMay 12, 1972.\nKinder & Scroggins, of Madison, (William F. Kinder, of counsel,) for appellant.\nGeorge B. Griggs, of Carlyle, for appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0626-01",
  "first_page_order": 648,
  "last_page_order": 649
}