{
  "id": 3401167,
  "name": "THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MICHAEL E. MORRIS, Defendant-Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "People v. Morris",
  "decision_date": "1977-12-07",
  "docket_number": "No. 77-134",
  "first_page": "1039",
  "last_page": "1041",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "54 Ill. App. 3d 1039"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "368 N.E.2d 870",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "68 Ill. 2d 149",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. 2d",
      "case_ids": [
        5809665
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-2d/68/0149-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "321 N.E.2d 71",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "23 Ill. App. 3d 620",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App. 3d",
      "case_ids": [
        2508972
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app-3d/23/0620-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "268 N.E.2d 227",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.2d",
      "year": 1974,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "131 Ill. App. 2d 175",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App. 2d",
      "case_ids": [
        2904271
      ],
      "year": 1974,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app-2d/131/0175-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "361 N.E.2d 344",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.2d",
      "year": 1971,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "46 Ill. App. 3d 858",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App. 3d",
      "case_ids": [
        2970470
      ],
      "year": 1971,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app-3d/46/0858-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "286 N.E.2d 389",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "7 Ill. App. 3d 58",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App. 3d",
      "case_ids": [
        2666761
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app-3d/7/0058-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "223 N.E.2d 716",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.2d",
      "year": 1972,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "719"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "79 Ill. App. 2d 174",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App. 2d",
      "case_ids": [
        2565792
      ],
      "year": 1972,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "178"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app-2d/79/0174-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 338,
    "char_count": 4404,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.875,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 7.728108280744093e-08,
      "percentile": 0.454470125478358
    },
    "sha256": "0d7b5f47d7953b922974dbbc741c2ca25fff9ab131bbe76587a510144484f9d4",
    "simhash": "1:b9c1a5ed60f03d66",
    "word_count": 750
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:56:34.806209+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MICHAEL E. MORRIS, Defendant-Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. JUSTICE BARRY\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nFollowing a jury trial, the defendant, Michael Ellis Morris, was found guilty of burglary and was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not less than 4 nor more than 20 years. In this appeal, he contends the sentence was excessive.\nIt is the policy of this State to prescribe penalties which are proportionate to the seriousness of the offense and which allow for the possibility of rehabilitation. (Ill. Const. 1970, art. I, \u00a711; Ill. Rev. Stat. 1975, ch. 38, pars. 1 \u2014 2 & 1001 \u2014 1\u20142.) In applying this policy, the \u201c[a]dequacy of the punishment should determine the minimum sentence, with the maximum dependent upon the court\u2019s divination as to the length of time required to achieve rehabilitation.\u201d People v. Lillie (5th Dist. 1967), 79 Ill. App. 2d 174, 178, 223 N.E.2d 716, 719. Accord, People v. Brown (5th Dist. 1972), 7 Ill. App. 3d 58, 286 N.E.2d 389.\nWhen the appellate court is asked to exercise its power to reduce sentences however, that power will be exercised cautiously because the trial court is in a better position to determine the punishment to be imposed. (People v. Sweeney (3d Dist. 1977), 46 Ill. App. 3d 858, 361 N.E.2d 344.) The basis for granting a reduction is not judicial clemency (People v. Aristole (1st Dist. 1971), 131 Ill. App. 2d 175, 268 N.E.2d 227), but rather evidence in the record of an abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court (People v. Cole (3d Dist. 1974), 23 Ill. App. 3d 620, 321 N.E.2d 71).\nBurglary is a Class 2 felony (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1975, ch. 38, par. 19 \u2014 1(b)), and for a Class 2 felony, the maximum sentence \u201cshall be any term in excess of one year not exceeding 20 years\u201d (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1975, ch. 38, par. 1005 \u2014 8\u20141(b) (3)), while the minimum sentence must be one year \u201cunless the court, having regard to the nature and circumstances of the offense and the history and character of defendant, sets a high minimum term \u2022 * (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1975, ch. 38, par. 1005 \u2014 8\u20141(c)(3)).\nAlthough the facts establishing guilt were merely that the defendant reached through the open window of an automobile and absconded with a set of wrenches, the presentence report indicated that the defendant had 12 prior convictions. Four of these convictions were felony convictions, three of which occurred prior to 1963. The defendant\u2019s most recent conviction occurred in Wisconsin, on June 2, 1973, and was for indecent behavior with a child. At the time of his arrest for the instant offense the defendant was on parole for the Wisconsin conviction.\nThe trial court expressed a concern not only with the seriousness of the felonies, but also,with the fact that \u201cafter being convicted in 1973 of a felony in Wisconsin with a four year sentence indicating a mandatory release date of August 3, 1976, you are in trouble on August 16, 1976, in Peoria.\u201d Even though conceding that this offense was \u201cnot one of the more serious types,\u201d the history and character of the defendant warranted a minimum sentence greater than one year.\nThis is a rational conclusion and does not establish an abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court. Nor can we agree with the defendant that the maximum sentence imposed by the trial court implies that the trial court perceived virtually no possibility of rehabilitation. The trial court\u2019s reason for the high maximum was to keep the defendant in custody if he violated parole again. While protecting the public in the event the attempt at rehabilitating the defendant once again fails, the best interests of the defendant have been served since the defendant has been given both the opportunity and the incentive for rehabilitation by combining the long maximum sentence with a minimum sentence which could allow the defendant to receive parole in about three years. See People v. Perruquet (1977), 68 Ill. 2d 149, 368 N.E.2d 870.\nAccordingly, the judgment of the Circuit Court of Peoria County is affirmed.\nAffirmed.\nALLOY, P. J., and STOUDER, J., concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. JUSTICE BARRY"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Robert Agostinelli and Verlin R. Meinz, both of State Appellate Defender\u2019s Office, of Ottawa, for appellant.",
      "Michael M. Mihm, State\u2019s Attorney, of Peoria (James E. Hinterlong, of Illinois State\u2019s Attorneys Association, of counsel), for the People."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MICHAEL E. MORRIS, Defendant-Appellant.\nThird District\nNo. 77-134\nOpinion filed December 7, 1977.\nRobert Agostinelli and Verlin R. Meinz, both of State Appellate Defender\u2019s Office, of Ottawa, for appellant.\nMichael M. Mihm, State\u2019s Attorney, of Peoria (James E. Hinterlong, of Illinois State\u2019s Attorneys Association, of counsel), for the People."
  },
  "file_name": "1039-01",
  "first_page_order": 1061,
  "last_page_order": 1063
}