{
  "id": 2844741,
  "name": "The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles Wiggins (Impleaded), Defendant-Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "People v. Wiggins",
  "decision_date": "1973-01-30",
  "docket_number": "No. 56963",
  "first_page": "1078",
  "last_page": "1079",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "9 Ill. App. 3d 1078"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "243 N.E.2d 225",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "41 Ill.2d 364",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. 2d",
      "case_ids": [
        2853826
      ],
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "367"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-2d/41/0364-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "264 N.E.2d 236",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.2d",
      "year": 1969,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "129 Ill. App.2d 356",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App. 2d",
      "case_ids": [
        2741121
      ],
      "year": 1969,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "363"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app-2d/129/0356-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "276 N.E.2d 32",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.2d",
      "year": 1970,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "2 Ill.App.3d 120",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App. 3d",
      "case_ids": [
        2751447
      ],
      "year": 1970,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "125-126"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app-3d/2/0120-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "264 N.E.2d 850",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.2d",
      "year": 1971,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "130 Ill.App.2d 212",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App. 2d",
      "case_ids": [
        2826501
      ],
      "year": 1971,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app-2d/130/0212-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "238 N.E.2d 94",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "95 Ill.App.2d 17",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App. 2d",
      "case_ids": [
        2537844
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app-2d/95/0017-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "223 N.E.2d 548",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.2d",
      "year": 1968,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "79 Ill.App.2d 348",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App. 2d",
      "case_ids": [
        2564066
      ],
      "year": 1968,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app-2d/79/0348-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "285 N.E.2d 612",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "6 Ill.App.3d 296",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App. 3d",
      "case_ids": [
        2467966
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app-3d/6/0296-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "285 N.E.2d 247",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.2d",
      "year": 1972,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "6 Ill.App.3d 136",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App. 3d",
      "case_ids": [
        2465254
      ],
      "year": 1972,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app-3d/6/0136-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "263 N.E.2d 7",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.2d",
      "year": 1972,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "46 Ill.2d 311",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. 2d",
      "case_ids": [
        2899055
      ],
      "year": 1972,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-2d/46/0311-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "242 N.E.2d 167",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.2d",
      "year": 1970,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "41 Ill.2d 98",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. 2d",
      "case_ids": [
        2852703
      ],
      "year": 1970,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "101"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-2d/41/0098-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "207 N.E.2d 76",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.2d",
      "year": 1968,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "32 Ill.2d 441",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. 2d",
      "case_ids": [
        2841109
      ],
      "year": 1968,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-2d/32/0441-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 295,
    "char_count": 4018,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.751,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.5671529820784874e-08,
      "percentile": 0.34994646406025987
    },
    "sha256": "0512af06b9fffdddc79d418f4312e1f05e91beab90cdd208eeb323238b1d98ec",
    "simhash": "1:b3513009bb6acc85",
    "word_count": 687
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:41:33.026395+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles Wiggins (Impleaded), Defendant-Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM:\nCharles Wiggins, defendant, and his brother, Jerry Wiggins, who is not involved in this appeal, were found guilty, after a bench trial, of the crime of attempt theft, in that they knowingly attempted to remove the right front tire from the automobile of Lionell Coppleson, in violation of Section 8 \u2014 4 of the Criminal Code. Jerry Wiggins was sentenced to 90 days to the House of Correction. Charles Wiggins was sentenced to a term of six months to the House of Correction. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1971, ch. 38, par. 8 \u2014 4.) He appealed. Jerry Wiggins did not.\nThe defendant contends that the evidence failed to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the automobile from which the theft of a tire was attempted was the property of Lionell Coppleson. Before trial, but after the witnesses were sworn, the trial court and the Public Defender had the following conversation:\n\u201cThe Court: Do you want to stipulate to ownership?\nMr. Walters: I will stipulate to ownership and that he failed to give the two defendants consent to approach it and attempt to remove any part of his vehicle.\u201d\nWhen the Public Defender argued the defendants\u2019 motion for a directed finding at the close of the State\u2019s case and again at the close of all the evidence he did not raise the issue that the State failed to prove that the blue 1970 Ford from which the defendants attempted to take a tire, bearing Illinois license No. RE 9201, was the property of Lionell Coppleson. It is the general rule of law that matters not raised in the trial court cannot be raised for the first time in the Appellate Court. (People v. Irwin (1965), 32 Ill.2d 441, 207 N.E.2d 76; People v. Adams (1968), 41 Ill.2d 98, 101, 242 N.E.2d 167.) It is also a general rule of law that matters which were stipulated to by the parties cannot be disputed on appeal. People v. Holloman (1970), 46 Ill.2d 311, 263 N.E.2d 7; People v. Morris (1972), 6 Ill.App.3d 136, 285 N.E.2d 247; People v. Piehl (1972), 6 Ill.App.3d 296, 285 N.E.2d 612.\nThe cases cited by the defendant are not in point because in those cases the defendant did not stipulate as to the ownership of the property.\nIn the case at bar, the record clearly shows that the defendant stipulated that LioneU Coppleson owned the blue 1970 Ford, bearing Illinois license No. RE 9201, and that he did not \u201cgive the two defendants consent to approach it and attempt to remove any part of his vehicle.\u201d Therefore, it was not necessary for the State to prove ownership of the automobUe from which the theft of the tire was attempted.\nDefendant also argues that he is entitled to a hearing in aggravation and mitigation because it was not expressly waived by him. He states that consequently the case should be remanded for a hearing in aggravation and mitigation. People v. Smice (1967), 79 Ill.App.2d 348, 223 N.E.2d 548, and People v. Sessions (1968), 95 Ill.App.2d 17, 238 N.E.2d 94.\nHowever, in People v. Parr (1970), 130 Ill.App.2d 212, 264 N.E.2d 850, this court held that the defendant\u2019s failure to request a hearing in aggravation and mitigation constituted a waiver of his right to such a hearing. Other cases to the same effect are People v. Jackson (1971), 2 Ill.App.3d 120, 125-126, 276 N.E.2d 32; People v. Riso (1970), 129 Ill. App.2d 356, 363, 264 N.E.2d 236; People v. Nelson (1969), 41 Ill.2d 364, 367, 243 N.E.2d 225. In the case at bar, the record shows that the defendant did not request a hearing and, therefore, it has been waived.\nThere being no reversible error, the judgment is affirmed.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "James J. Doherty, Public Defender, of Chicago, (Stanley J. Sacks and Thaddeus L. Kowalski, Assistant Public Defenders, of counsel,) for appellant.",
      "Bernard Carey, State\u2019s Attorney, of Chicago, (Elmer C. Kissane and Robin K. Auld, Assistant State\u2019s Attorneys, of counsel,) for the People."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles Wiggins (Impleaded), Defendant-Appellant.\n(No. 56963;\nFirst District (2nd Division)\nJanuary 30, 1973.\nRehearing denied March 6,1973.\nJames J. Doherty, Public Defender, of Chicago, (Stanley J. Sacks and Thaddeus L. Kowalski, Assistant Public Defenders, of counsel,) for appellant.\nBernard Carey, State\u2019s Attorney, of Chicago, (Elmer C. Kissane and Robin K. Auld, Assistant State\u2019s Attorneys, of counsel,) for the People."
  },
  "file_name": "1078-01",
  "first_page_order": 1100,
  "last_page_order": 1101
}