{
  "id": 852709,
  "name": "Henry H. Shepard, Adm'r. v. Joshua Rhodes et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Shepard v. Rhodes",
  "decision_date": "1882-03-22",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "557",
  "last_page": "558",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "10 Ill. App. 557"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "3 Gilm. 490",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Gilm.",
      "case_ids": [
        2463438
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/8/0490-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "1 Scam. 55",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Scam.",
      "case_ids": [
        2481319
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/2/0055-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "60 Ill. 301",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        8500986
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/60/0301-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 188,
    "char_count": 2800,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.514,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.030107546810644172
    },
    "sha256": "bd97180b8faaef8c52cdedd6c5cfc5ec9b2ea18e2329554763609e9601a6a072",
    "simhash": "1:9ec3b1e9f23c9978",
    "word_count": 482
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:14:56.607874+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Henry H. Shepard, Adm\u2019r. v. Joshua Rhodes et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Wilson, P. J.\nThis is an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Cook county, dismissing an appeal from the county court at the costs of Shepard, defendant below and appellant here. ' It appears from the record that Rhodes and Rhodes & Co. filed a claim in the county court for the use of Phillips against the estate of Ricketsou, of which Shepard was administrator, for $39,580.38, which was allowed at $38,845.01 to be paid out of such assets as might be discovered after the expiration of two years from the original grant of letters of administration. Prom that judgment Rhodes and Rhodes & Co. appealed to the superior court.\nThe superior court, on April 29, 1879, entered the following judgment : \u201c And now on this day it is ordered that said appeal be and the same is hereby dismissed at defendant\u2019s cost for want of prosecution, and that a procedendo do issue herein to the court below. Therefore it is considered by the court that the plaintiffs do have and recover of and from the defendant his costs and charges in this behalf expended and have execution therefor.\u201d\nThis judgment is manifestly erroneous. The appeal from the county court was not taken by Shepard, the administrator but by the claimants, Rhodes and Rhodes & Co. As the record stands, the appeal is dismissed at defendant\u2019s costs, for tailing to prosecute an appeal, which he did not take. Upon the call of the docket, the defendant was entitled to have the suit dismissed at the plaintiffs\u2019 costs, if the latter did not appear; or, at the defendant\u2019s election, to have the appeal dismissed With a procedendo to the court below. It does not appear that the order dismissing the appeal was-made at the instance of either party, but if the court, on its own motion, saw fit to enter such order it should have awarded the costs against the plaintiffs for want of prosecution.\nThe judgment was also erroneous in awarding costs and execution against Shepard in his personal character.\nThe judgment of the court below is reversed and the cause remanded.\nReversed and remanded.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Wilson, P. J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mr. Melville W. Fuller for appellant;"
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Henry H. Shepard, Adm\u2019r. v. Joshua Rhodes et al.\n1. Dismissal of appeal\u2014Costs.\u2014Where the plaintiff in the county coart brought his appeal to the superior court, it was error for the latter court, upon the call of the docket, to dismiss the appeal at the costs of the defendant below. Costs should have been awarded against the plaintiff for want of prosecution.\n2. Costs ag-atnst administrator.\u2014It is error to render a judgment for costs against an administrator in his personal character.\nAppeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Sidney Smith, Judge, presiding.\nOpinion filed March 22, 1882.\nMr. Melville W. Fuller for appellant;\ncited Shepard v. Rhodes, 60 Ill. 301; Church v. Jewett, 1 Scam. 55; Welch v. Wallace, 3 Gilm. 490."
  },
  "file_name": "0557-01",
  "first_page_order": 553,
  "last_page_order": 554
}