{
  "id": 2599995,
  "name": "Chicago, B. & Q. R. R. Co. v. Richard Camper, Adm'r, etc.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Chicago, B. & Q. R. R. v. Camper",
  "decision_date": "1902-01-24",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "21",
  "last_page": "22",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "100 Ill. App. 21"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 120,
    "char_count": 1262,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.578,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.061447019797991e-08,
      "percentile": 0.31825214520228784
    },
    "sha256": "3cd65e67682a167f084b69816cdb2fa6bfab2c6788ffc182ca8d9f2b9889d581",
    "simhash": "1:c4c3bb217c330ada",
    "word_count": 216
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:58:18.095621+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Chicago, B. & Q. R. R. Co. v. Richard Camper, Adm'r, etc."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Opinion peb Oubiam.\nMr. Justice Brown tried this cause in the court below and has therefore taken no part in its consideration here. Upon a careful consideration of the cause by the remaining justices they are divided in opinion whether said judgment should be affirmed or reversed. The judgment of the court below is therefore affirmed by operation of law.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Opinion peb Oubiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mr. Albert J. Hopkins, Mr. Feed A. Dolph and Mr. Robert Bruce Scott, attorneys for appellant; Mr. Chester M. Dawes, of counsel.",
      "Murphy, Alschuler & Newhall, attorneys for appellee; Samuel Alschuler, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Chicago, B. & Q. R. R. Co. v. Richard Camper, Adm'r, etc.\n1. Affirmance\u2014By Operation of Law.\u2014Where one of the judges of the Appellate Court is disqualified to sit in an appealed case by reason of his having presided at the trial of the cause in the court below, and the remaining justices are divided in opinion as to whether the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed or reversed, such judgment will stand affirmed by operation of law.\nTrespass on the Case.\u2014Death from negligent act. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Kane County; the Hon. George W. Brown, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the October term, 1901.\nAffirmed -by operation of law.\nOpinion filed January 24, 1902.\nMr. Albert J. Hopkins, Mr. Feed A. Dolph and Mr. Robert Bruce Scott, attorneys for appellant; Mr. Chester M. Dawes, of counsel.\nMurphy, Alschuler & Newhall, attorneys for appellee; Samuel Alschuler, of counsel."
  },
  "file_name": "0021-01",
  "first_page_order": 47,
  "last_page_order": 48
}