{
  "id": 2596828,
  "name": "William G. Derby v. Mary I. Derby",
  "name_abbreviation": "Derby v. Derby",
  "decision_date": "1902-04-09",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "154",
  "last_page": "155",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "101 Ill. App. 154"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 102,
    "char_count": 1161,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.603,
    "sha256": "4c0c7cb97191e4715d5eaae531f492c6af1bbd5fc7f8532c66c6787d82237665",
    "simhash": "1:d642e3bf6abca6fc",
    "word_count": 196
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:44:26.777914+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "William G. Derby v. Mary I. Derby."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Opinion per Curiam.\nThis writ of error is prosecuted to reverse a decree for separate maintenance rendered against the plaintiff in error in favor of defendant in error. The decree was rendered upon the verdict of a jury impaneled to try the case. The defendant in error has filed no brief and for that reason we could reverse the decree proforma under rule 28. We have read the abstract, however, and find from it, that the verdict of the jury is wholly unsupported by the evidence.\nThe evidence, as it appears in the abstract, shows that the defendant in error is voluntarily and without sufficient cause living separate and apart from her husband.\nDecree reversed and remanded.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Opinion per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Lane & Coopee, for plaintiff in error.",
      "No appearance for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "William G. Derby v. Mary I. Derby.\n1, Verdicts\u2014 Unsupported by the Evidence.\u2014A verdict wholly unsupported by the evidence will be set aside, and a decree based upon it will be reversed.\nSeparate Maintenance.\u2014Error to the Circuit Court o\u00ed Montgomery County; the Hon. Samuel L. Dwight, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the November term, 1901.'\nReversed and remanded.\nOpinion filed April 9, 1902.\nLane & Coopee, for plaintiff in error.\nNo appearance for defendant in error."
  },
  "file_name": "0154-01",
  "first_page_order": 180,
  "last_page_order": 181
}