{
  "id": 2597486,
  "name": "G. E. Colson v. James Rush",
  "name_abbreviation": "Colson v. Rush",
  "decision_date": "1902-02-19",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "195",
  "last_page": "196",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "101 Ill. App. 195"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 77,
    "char_count": 778,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.529,
    "sha256": "f5c2e7284948fcfc269fb480d75ff9a84a2dcf4db06d7c95f71d99069455883a",
    "simhash": "1:40424aa89a0bb9e2",
    "word_count": 136
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:44:26.777914+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "G. E. Colson v. James Rush."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "IEr. Presiding Justice Burroughs\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nThe record in this case is .in the samo condition and presents the same questions as in the case of Gr. E. Colson v. John Linn, decided by this court at, this term; and for the reasons given in the opinion in that case, the judgment in this will be affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "IEr. Presiding Justice Burroughs"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Andrews & Vause, attorneys for appellant.",
      "Golden, Soholfield & Booth, attorneys for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "G. E. Colson v. James Rush.\n1. Former Decision\u2014Folio wed.\u2014The decision, in this case follows that of the case of G. E. Colson v. John Linn (ante).\nAppeal from the County Court of Clark County; the Hon. J. C. Purdue, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the November term, 1901.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed February 19, 1902.\nRehearing denied May 27, 1902.\nAndrews & Vause, attorneys for appellant.\nGolden, Soholfield & Booth, attorneys for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0195-01",
  "first_page_order": 221,
  "last_page_order": 222
}