{
  "id": 2589558,
  "name": "John Nehring v. Chris Larson,",
  "name_abbreviation": "Nehring v. Larson",
  "decision_date": "1902-07-18",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "160",
  "last_page": "160",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "103 Ill. App. 160"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 106,
    "char_count": 1329,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.515,
    "sha256": "e00ecb5f1afe2d69b6c08385267b36462dde7c951e96f89e761289655a436c35",
    "simhash": "1:cfc40e84b9950a76",
    "word_count": 222
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:00:05.984899+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "John Nehring v. Chris Larson."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presidino Justice Brown\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nThis is an action of trespass for assault and battery. There was a trial by jury which resulted in a verdict and judgment for $75. A former trial resulted in a disagreement of the jury. There are no questions of law presented for our consideration. The only reason urged for a reversal is that the verdict and judgment were unwarranted by the evidence.\nThe evidence is conflicting. The jury and trial judge had superior opportunities to judge of the credibility of the witnesses. We see no reason for disturbing the conclusion of facts reached by the jury and approved by the judge who tried the case.\nJudgment aifirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presidino Justice Brown"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Carnes & Dunton, attorneys for appellant.",
      "Cliffs & Cliffs and James W. Cliffe, attorneys for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "John Nehring v. Chris Larson.\n1. Practice\u2014Where Evidence is Conflicting.\u2014Where the evidence is conflicting, the jury and trial judge have superior opportunities to judge of the credibility of the witnesses, and this court will not disturb the conclusion of facts reached by the jury and approved by the judge who tried the case.\nTrespass, for assault and battery. Appeal from the Circuit Court of DeKalb County; the Hon. Charles A. Bishop, Judge presiding. Heard in this court at the April term, 1902.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed July 18, 1902.\nCarnes & Dunton, attorneys for appellant.\nCliffs & Cliffs and James W. Cliffe, attorneys for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0160-01",
  "first_page_order": 190,
  "last_page_order": 190
}