{
  "id": 2587615,
  "name": "Annie Pavey v. John H. C. Pavey",
  "name_abbreviation": "Pavey v. Pavey",
  "decision_date": "1902-09-11",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "589",
  "last_page": "590",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "103 Ill. App. 589"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 97,
    "char_count": 1103,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.525,
    "sha256": "2fe43a1758197e1f93d072006b2a693b3e2836e0429b7d53b032161088b8418f",
    "simhash": "1:dfcd947ff37ba63c",
    "word_count": 194
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:00:05.984899+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Annie Pavey v. John H. C. Pavey."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Worthington\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nThis was a suit for divorce brought by defendant in error. A decree was rendered in his favor. The defendant to the suit brings the case to this court by writ of error, and defendant in error having failed to tile his brief, the decree of the Circuit Court is reversed and the bill of defendant in error is dismissed proforma, under rule 29 of this court. An examination of the testimony in the record fails to show any valid reason why rule 29 should not be enforced.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Worthington"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "W. it. MoI\u00edernon, attorney for plaintiff in error.",
      "JSTp appearance by defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Annie Pavey v. John H. C. Pavey.\n1. Appellate Court Practice\u2014Rule 2,9.\u2014Where the defendant in error fails to file his bjrief in compliance with the. rules of this court, the decree of the Circuit Court will be reversed and the bill of defendant in error dismissed proforma, under rule 39.\nDivorce.\u2014Error to the Circuit Court of Gallatin County; the Hon. Edmund D. Youngblood, Judge presiding. Heard in this court at the August term, 1903.\nDismissed.\nOpinion filed September 11, 1902.\nW. it. MoI\u00edernon, attorney for plaintiff in error.\nJSTp appearance by defendant in error."
  },
  "file_name": "0589-01",
  "first_page_order": 619,
  "last_page_order": 620
}