{
  "id": 2585695,
  "name": "Jacob S. Hovland v. McNeill & Higgins Co.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hovland v. McNeill & Higgins Co.",
  "decision_date": "1902-11-11",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "149",
  "last_page": "150",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "104 Ill. App. 149"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 128,
    "char_count": 1986,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.53,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.0417561518279478e-07,
      "percentile": 0.5510583821682268
    },
    "sha256": "23c61641e16cd8c047b2dfc590625a05ab21dcb00a04cf680bbcab39a3197352",
    "simhash": "1:99d7f0f118e71ccc",
    "word_count": 330
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:34:57.519371+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Jacob S. Hovland v. McNeill & Higgins Co."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Waterman\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nThe twentieth day of November, A. B. 1899, in the Superior Court of Cook County, the issues made up between appellant, as garnishee of one Andrew P. Johnson, and appellee, were tried. At the conclusion of the evidence offered by appellee, appellant moved the court to discharge the garnishee. This the court did. Upon appeal to the Appellate Court, that court ordered that the judgment of the Superior Court be reversed and \u201c wholly for nothing esteemed,\u201d and that the cause be remanded \u201c for such other and further proceedings as to law and justice shall appertain.\u201d\nThe case being thereafter called in the Superior Court, that court, by a misunderstanding of all parties as- to what the order of this court was, entered judgment against appellant without allowing him to introduce any evidence.\nUnder the order of this court the parties were entitled to introduce evidence and to a trial of the case de novo,. the trial court applying therein the law enunciated in the opinion of this court.\nThe judgment of the Superior Court is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Waterman"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Herbert S. Buncombe, attorney for appellant.",
      "Oscar B. McGlasson and Pease & Polkey, attorneys for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Jacob S. Hovland v. McNeill & Higgins Co.\n1. Practice\u2014Where Judgment of Superior Court is Reversed and Remanded.\u2014Where the Appellate Court orders that the judgment of the Superior Court be reversed and wholly for nothing esteemed,\u201d and that the cause be remanded \u201c for such other and further proceedings as to law and justice shall appertain,\u201d the parties are entitled to introduce evidence and to a trial of the case de novo, the trial court applying therein the law enunciated in the opinion of this court.\nGarnishment.\u2014Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Farlin Q. Ball, Judge presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1901.\nReversed and remanded.\nOpinion filed November 11, 1902.\nHerbert S. Buncombe, attorney for appellant.\nOscar B. McGlasson and Pease & Polkey, attorneys for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0149-01",
  "first_page_order": 173,
  "last_page_order": 174
}