{
  "id": 2585414,
  "name": "Robert C. Williams v. William Deering & Co.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Williams v. William Deering & Co.",
  "decision_date": "1902-11-13",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "290",
  "last_page": "290",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "104 Ill. App. 290"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 105,
    "char_count": 1348,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.579,
    "sha256": "4dad0e6147f697652f402465c6cb2a9f74169b2db9e6ebee81d50fb4d9f39ac2",
    "simhash": "1:b767c3af16670afc",
    "word_count": 237
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:34:57.519371+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Robert C. Williams v. William Deering & Co."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Ball\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nThis is an action for personal injuries from defective machinery.\nThe plaintiff had the right to show, if he could, by the witness Reiter, that the machine by which he was hurt was in a defective and dangerous condition for a long time before and within half an hour of the time of the accident; that such condition was not apparent, and that the defendant had prior knowledge thereof.\nIn our opinion a full and fair chance was not given the plaintiff in the trial court to present the grounds upon which he based his claim.\nThe judgment of the Circuit Court is reversed and the cause is remanded.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Ball"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "F. W. Jaros, attorney for plaintiff in error.",
      "0. W. Dynes, attorney for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Robert C. Williams v. William Deering & Co.\n1. Evidence\u2014Of Defective Machinery.\u2014The plaintiff has a right to , show that the machine by which he was hurt was in a defective and dangerous condition for a long time before and within half an hour of the time of the accident, that such condition was not apparent, and that the defendant had prior knowledge thereof.\nTrespass on the Case, for personal injuries. Error to the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Elbridgb Hanecy, Judge presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1902.\nReversed and remanded.\nOpinion filed November 13, 1902.\nF. W. Jaros, attorney for plaintiff in error.\n0. W. Dynes, attorney for defendant in error."
  },
  "file_name": "0290-01",
  "first_page_order": 314,
  "last_page_order": 314
}