{
  "id": 2564106,
  "name": "Mutual Protective League v. Catherine Craig",
  "name_abbreviation": "Mutual Protective League v. Craig",
  "decision_date": "1903-04-30",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "5",
  "last_page": "6",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "109 Ill. App. 5"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 148,
    "char_count": 1679,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.549,
    "sha256": "e48f0ed8ddc28be726f5376dcd1fe63111a9e55d15bbe710ae2abbf65261c23d",
    "simhash": "1:79857f0ec92396d0",
    "word_count": 284
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:51:53.684315+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Mutual Protective League v. Catherine Craig."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Wright\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nThis was a suit by appellee against appellant upon a contract of insurance of the life of Luke Craig, the husband of appellee, she being the beneficiary therein named. The contract contained a clause against suicide, sane or insane, limiting appellant\u2019s liability in case the assured should die by suicide, sane or insane, to the amount paid to it upon such contract, which was in this case $11.20, and which was tendered and the tender kept good. The defense was that the assured committed suicide, and the question of fact for the jury\u2019s decision was whether the death of the assured was caused by suicide or accident. The verdict was for $1,600, and the judgment accordingly, from which this appeal was taken.\nUpon an examination of the evidence we have no reasonable doubt the assured came to his death by suicide. From the evidence contained in the record there can be no other rational conclusion, and in this respect the verdict is against the evidence, and a new trial should have been ordered.\nThe judgment of the Circuit Court will be reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Wright"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "David R. Kinder, attorney for appellant; Thomas M. Jett, of counsel.",
      "B. F. Shipley and I. A. Buckingham, attorneys for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Mutual Protective League v. Catherine Craig.\n1. Insurance\u2014Death by Suicide.\u2014The court reviews the evidence and holds that it does not warrant the verdict returned.\nAssumpsit, on a benefit certificate. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Macon County; the Hon. Edward P. Vail, Judge presiding. Heard in this court at the November term, 1903.\nReversed and remanded.\nOpinion filed April 30, 1903.\nDavid R. Kinder, attorney for appellant; Thomas M. Jett, of counsel.\nB. F. Shipley and I. A. Buckingham, attorneys for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0005-01",
  "first_page_order": 31,
  "last_page_order": 32
}