{
  "id": 5777084,
  "name": "The Peoria, Decatur & Evansville Railway Company v. B. B. Booth",
  "name_abbreviation": "Peoria, Decatur & Evansville Railway Co. v. Booth",
  "decision_date": "1882-09-29",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "358",
  "last_page": "358",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "11 Ill. App. 358"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "91 Ill. 104",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2752141
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/91/0104-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "71 Ill. 274",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 99,
    "char_count": 914,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.502,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.17022459610579613
    },
    "sha256": "26856e0dbe9d7847f1c75eadb570ef12465032784a20697308742f7d620533d3",
    "simhash": "1:9c5787a91830bd28",
    "word_count": 164
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:01:48.859971+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The Peoria, Decatur & Evansville Railway Company v. B. B. Booth."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe causes for a new trial were specified in tlie motion filed therefor in the court below. It was not suggested as a cause for new trial that the damages were excessive. This being so, this ground for a new trial can not be urged in this court. Emory v. Addis, 71 Ill. 274; Jones v. Jones, Idem, 562; R. R. Co. v. McMath, 91 Ill. 104.\nThe judgment is affirmed.\nCasey, J., took no part in the decision of this case.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Hr. John B. Cohes and Hr. J. P. Robinson, for appellant.",
      "\u25a0 Hessrs. Pithian, Heap & Wheeler, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "The Peoria, Decatur & Evansville Railway Company v. B. B. Booth.\nMotion for new trial \u2014 Causes suggested. \u2014 Where the motion for a new trial does not suggest as a cause therefor that the damages were excessive, such objection can not be urged on appeal.\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Jasper county; the Ron. Thomas S. Caset, Judge, presiding.\nOpinion filed September 29, 1882.\nHr. John B. Cohes and Hr. J. P. Robinson, for appellant.\n\u25a0 Hessrs. Pithian, Heap & Wheeler, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0358-01",
  "first_page_order": 354,
  "last_page_order": 354
}