{
  "id": 5777322,
  "name": "The People, etc., v. The Wabash, St. Louis and Pacific Railway Co.",
  "name_abbreviation": "People v. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co.",
  "decision_date": "1882-10-24",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "512",
  "last_page": "513",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "11 Ill. App. 512"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 124,
    "char_count": 1682,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.533,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.676830387708631e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3560087866126558
    },
    "sha256": "e154d661e263ca681bec793969b37ddc63b21e0c197947c90ab297b4ccf55c16",
    "simhash": "1:83855c212e1b5b81",
    "word_count": 296
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:01:48.859971+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The People, etc., v. The Wabash, St. Louis and Pacific Railway Co."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nA preliminary motion was made in this case to affirm the judgment of the court below for non-compliance with the rule of this court requiring printed abstracts to be filed, which motion was reserve 1 until the hearing. Upon an examination of the record, we find that no bill of exceptions was taken to the action of the court below in dismissing the #cause for want of a bond for costs as alleged in the record. The point sought to be presented by the first assignment of error, can not therefore be considered by us, and thejudgme.it of the court below in dismissing the suit must be affirmed.\nBut subsequently to the dismissal of the cause the court rendered judgment against the People for costs and awarded . execution therefor. In this the court erred. The stipulation signed by counsel that no such judgment was rendered can not change the record of the court below, which must stand until reversed by an appellate court, or amended in that court.\nThe order \u201eof this court will therefore be that the action of the court below in dismissing the cause, be affirmed, but in so far as it renders judgment against the People for costs, and awards execution therefor, the same be reversed.\nReversed in part and affirmed in part.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mr. James McCartney, Atty. Gen., for plaintiff in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "The People, etc., v. The Wabash, St. Louis and Pacific Railway Co.\n1. Exceptions. \u2014 Where no exceptions are taken to the action of the court below, the error assigned will not be considered in this court.\n2. Costs. \u2014 Il> was error to render a judgment for costs against the People, upon dismissing the cause.\nError to the Circuit Court of Ford county.\nOpinion filed October 24, 1882.\nMr. James McCartney, Atty. Gen., for plaintiff in error."
  },
  "file_name": "0512-01",
  "first_page_order": 508,
  "last_page_order": 509
}