{
  "id": 5777817,
  "name": "Edwin Harris v. William Dickson",
  "name_abbreviation": "Harris v. Dickson",
  "decision_date": "1882-10-24",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "515",
  "last_page": "515",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "11 Ill. App. 515"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "91 Ill. 25",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2751755
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/91/0025-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 81,
    "char_count": 701,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.535,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.17024390225067176
    },
    "sha256": "9270f2f801bfc3120516dd98a45ac3c262fcc3abc3d4d08f60957ab405068b6f",
    "simhash": "1:894358254b2d9f32",
    "word_count": 121
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:01:48.859971+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Edwin Harris v. William Dickson."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe bill of exceptions in this case shows no motion for new trial nor any exception to any ruling of the trial court.\nWe are therefore precluded from inquiring into the sufficiency of the evidence to support the finding of the court, or the correctness of its . ruling in overruling the motion for a new trial. Knott et al. v. Swannell, 91 Ill. 25.\nJudgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mr. H. W. Baughman and Mr. H. W. Masters, for appellant.",
      "Messrs. Gray & Waggoner, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Edwin Harris v. William Dickson.\nExceptions \u2014 Exceptions to the ruling of the court below must be taken.\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Fulton county; the Hon. S. P. Shops, Judge, presiding.\nOpinion filed October 24, 1882.\nMr. H. W. Baughman and Mr. H. W. Masters, for appellant.\nMessrs. Gray & Waggoner, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0515-01",
  "first_page_order": 511,
  "last_page_order": 511
}