{
  "id": 2554498,
  "name": "Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Charles C. Cline",
  "name_abbreviation": "Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Cline",
  "decision_date": "1903-10-12",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "424",
  "last_page": "425",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "111 Ill. App. 424"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 148,
    "char_count": 1729,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.516,
    "sha256": "bb313b00a53094e5c81241a40c886cb1bee767fd67db14dcbd8529041e766c7e",
    "simhash": "1:18caaa11cd390695",
    "word_count": 297
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:54:24.452659+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Charles C. Cline."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Puterbaugh\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nThis is an action in case, brought by appellee against appellant, to recover damages for the loss of the services of Clyde Cline, the minor son of appellee, and for money paid out by appellee for medical services rendered said Clyde Cline; all resulting from injuries received by him through the alleged negligent management of a freight train operated by appellant\u2019s servants, upon its railway.\nThe plaintiff recovered judgment in the trial court for $1,000, from which the defendant appeals.\nThe facts developed on the trial of the case, and the questions of law involved, are, in substance, identical with those in the case of appellant against Clyde Cline, in which the opinion of this court has been this day filed.\nFor the reasons therein . assigned, the judgment of the Circuit Court will be reversed without remanding.\nReversed.\nFinding of facts to be incorporated in the judgment of the court:\nWe find, as ultimate facts, that at the time the said Clyde Cline received the injury complained of in the declaration, he was a trespasser upon the right of way and tracks of the defendant, and that said injury was not caused by the wanton act or negligence of the defendant.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Puterbaugh"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "C. S. Conger, for appellant.",
      "J. W. Graham, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Charles C. Cline.\nThis case is controlled by the decision in C., C., C. & St. L. Ey. Co. v. Clyde Cline (ante, p. 416).\nAction on the case for loss of services of minor child. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Clark County; the Hon. Henry Van Sellar, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the May term, 1903.\nReversed with finding of facts.\nOpinion filed October 12, 1903.\nC. S. Conger, for appellant.\nJ. W. Graham, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0424-01",
  "first_page_order": 442,
  "last_page_order": 443
}
