{
  "id": 872890,
  "name": "Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad Company and Chicago & Western Indiana Railroad Company v. Apollonia Schmitz",
  "name_abbreviation": "Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. Schmitz",
  "decision_date": "1904-03-18",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 10,988",
  "first_page": "295",
  "last_page": "296",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "113 Ill. App. 295"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 101,
    "char_count": 1008,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.551,
    "sha256": "f8c2c32cefb9ebb21f07b69a216714926552d9b563f8601a2af93923ca747ffb",
    "simhash": "1:d53f32a912bc48f3",
    "word_count": 167
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:22:42.184794+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad Company and Chicago & Western Indiana Railroad Company v. Apollonia Schmitz."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Stein\npresided at the trial of this cause in the Superior Court and took no part in the decision thereof in this court.\nThe other judges being unable to agree as to the judgment herein, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed of law.\nAffirmed by operation of lam.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Stein"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Will H. Lyford and Kenesaw M. Landis, for appellants; Albert M. Cross, of counsel.",
      "Richolson & Levy, for appellee; C. Stuart Beattie, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad Company and Chicago & Western Indiana Railroad Company v. Apollonia Schmitz.\nGen. No. 10,988.\n1. Affirmance\u2014when, results by oxoeration of lato. Where only two judges of the Appellate Court participate in the decision of a case and they disagree, an affirmance results by operation of law.\nAction on the case for personal injuries. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Philip Stein, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1902.\nAffirmed by operation of law.\nOpinion filed March 18, 1904.\nWill H. Lyford and Kenesaw M. Landis, for appellants; Albert M. Cross, of counsel.\nRicholson & Levy, for appellee; C. Stuart Beattie, of counsel."
  },
  "file_name": "0295-01",
  "first_page_order": 311,
  "last_page_order": 312
}