{
  "id": 2536877,
  "name": "Carterville Mining Company v. Coal Belt Railway Company",
  "name_abbreviation": "Carterville Mining Co. v. Coal Belt Railway Co.",
  "decision_date": "1904-09-21",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "158",
  "last_page": "158",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "116 Ill. App. 158"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 82,
    "char_count": 854,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.54,
    "sha256": "10f0e694a1bc37d6a706c67606c5046c09afb8e47cb35584c94e35ee28aa16d4",
    "simhash": "1:5dffdc86e883027c",
    "word_count": 139
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:50:54.720168+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Carterville Mining Company v. Coal Belt Railway Company."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThis case in all material respects is the same as New Ohio Washed Coal Company v. Coal Belt Railway Company, ante, p. 153. What we say there is applicable here. This case is controlled by that one.\nThe order of the Circuit Court granting the temporary injunction is affirmed.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Tenney, Coffeen, Harding & Wilkerson, for appellant.",
      "A. W. Underwood and F. W. Raymond, for appellee; Forman & Whitnel and J. A. McKeown, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Carterville Mining Company v. Coal Belt Railway Company.\nThis case is controlled by the decision in New Ohio Washed Coal Company v. Coal Belt Railway Company, ante, p. 153.\nAppeal from interlocutory injunctional order. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Williamson County; the Hon. Warren W. Duncan, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the August term, 1904.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed September 21, 1904.\nTenney, Coffeen, Harding & Wilkerson, for appellant.\nA. W. Underwood and F. W. Raymond, for appellee; Forman & Whitnel and J. A. McKeown, of counsel."
  },
  "file_name": "0158-01",
  "first_page_order": 176,
  "last_page_order": 176
}