{
  "id": 2538789,
  "name": "Charles F. Singmaster, et al., v. American Percheron Horse Breeders' & Importers' Association, et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Singmaster v. American Percheron Horse Breeders' & Importers' Ass'n",
  "decision_date": "1904-10-04",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 11,296",
  "first_page": "245",
  "last_page": "245",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "116 Ill. App. 245"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "168 Ill. 148",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        3187969
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/168/0148-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "115 Ill. 355",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2878590
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/115/0355-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 146,
    "char_count": 1671,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.554,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.207966869300525e-08,
      "percentile": 0.32738704071163993
    },
    "sha256": "a3203296477f6ff5b2751c91a2e8eaca201832de89bad233dc3f6ba79601849d",
    "simhash": "1:40578f135f677a10",
    "word_count": 280
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:50:54.720168+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Charles F. Singmaster, et al., v. American Percheron Horse Breeders\u2019 & Importers\u2019 Association, et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Stein\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nAppellants filed their bill of complaint against appellees which, upon a hearing, was dismissed. Thereupon they prayed for and were allowed a joint appeal to this court from the decree of dismissal, upon their executing the usual appeal bond. The bond is executed by a part only of appellants, and a motion has been made by appellees to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. The motion must be granted. Where an appeal is prayed by several and granted upon condition of their entering into bond, the condition and order must be complied with or the appeal cannot be perfected. All must join in the bond. Hileman v. Beale, 115 Ill. 355; Town v. Howieson, 175 id. 85; Lingle v. Chicago, 210 id. 600. In case of a failure to perfect the appeal in accordance with the order of the court, the appeal will be dismissed. Dobson v. Hughes, 168 Ill. 148.\nAppeal dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Stein"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Gordon A. Ramsay, for appellants; George P. Merrick and Ball & Lunsford, of counsel.",
      "Hopkins, Dolph, Peffers & Hopkins, Longenecker & Longenecker and Black & Goodwin, for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Charles F. Singmaster, et al., v. American Percheron Horse Breeders\u2019 & Importers\u2019 Association, et al.\nGen. No. 11,296.\n1. Appeal bond\u2014by whom to be executed. Where a joint appeal is granted to several parties upon condition of their entering into bond, all must join in the execution thereof or a dismissal of the appeal will follow.\nBill in chancery. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Edward F. Dunne, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1903.\nAppeal dismissed.\nOpinion filed October 4, 1904.\nGordon A. Ramsay, for appellants; George P. Merrick and Ball & Lunsford, of counsel.\nHopkins, Dolph, Peffers & Hopkins, Longenecker & Longenecker and Black & Goodwin, for appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0245-01",
  "first_page_order": 263,
  "last_page_order": 263
}