{
  "id": 2539353,
  "name": "John W. Guthrie v. John H. Costello, et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Guthrie v. Costello",
  "decision_date": "1904-10-14",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "500",
  "last_page": "500",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "116 Ill. App. 500"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "92 Ill. 187",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2742236
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/92/0187-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "88 Ill. 367",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5336900
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/88/0367-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "82 Ill. 107",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5314906
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/82/0107-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "81 Ill. 278",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2670206
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/81/0278-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 149,
    "char_count": 1917,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.515,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.08194435274025628
    },
    "sha256": "33cb597c218141a150fd8036d2f012d55c7ac4c8828f9cf66929912fe32b0a86",
    "simhash": "1:93ee27b568038fb1",
    "word_count": 329
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:50:54.720168+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "John W. Guthrie v. John H. Costello, et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Gest\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nThis is an action of replevin commenced by appellant before a justice of the peace. On the trial before the justice, judgment was entered for the plaintiff, Guthrie. Defendants appealed to the Circuit Court by filing bond with the circuit clerk. The judgment of the justice was rendered on November 2, 1901. The appeal bond was filed with the circuit clerk on November 23, 1901. No process appears to have been issued against the appellant upon the filing of the bond with the clerk, but at the April term, 1902, he entered his motion to dismiss the appeal for want of a sufficient appeal bond and because appeal-was not taken in time. The Circuit Court overruled the motion. Trial was had and judgment was rendered for defendant. It is urged here that the court erred in refusing to dismiss the appeal. We think the error is well assigned. The appeal was not taken within the twenty days prescribed by the statute. No appearance was entered by appellant except by his motion to dismiss appeal. The motion should have been allowed. Kemper v. Town of Waverly, 81 Ill. 278; Darwin v. Jones, 82 Ill. 107; Lucas v. Beebe, 88 Ill. 367; Rozier v. Williams, 92 Ill. 187.\nThe judgment is reversed and the cause remanded with directions to dismiss the appeal with procedendo.\nReversed and remanded with directions.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Gest"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Lane & Cooper, for appellant.",
      "Amos Oller and Jett & Kinder, for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "John W. Guthrie v. John H. Costello, et al.\n1. Appeal prom justice\u2014when, should he dismissed. An appeal from a justice of the peace should be dismissed where it appears that it was not taken and perfected within the twenty days prescribed by statute.\nAction of replevin. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Montgomery County; the Hon. William M. Farmer, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the May term, 1904.\nReversed and remanded with directions.\nOpinion filed October 14, 1904.\nLane & Cooper, for appellant.\nAmos Oller and Jett & Kinder, for appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0500-01",
  "first_page_order": 518,
  "last_page_order": 518
}