{
  "id": 2533105,
  "name": "Walter H. Browne v. August F. Nussbaumer",
  "name_abbreviation": "Browne v. Nussbaumer",
  "decision_date": "1905-01-05",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 11,685",
  "first_page": "501",
  "last_page": "502",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "117 Ill. App. 501"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "51 Ill. App. 371",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5113728
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/51/0371-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "49 Ill. App. 310",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5130454
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/49/0310-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "41 Ill. App. 516",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5028653
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/41/0516-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "9 Ill. App. 532",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        2410878
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/9/0532-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "5 Ill. App. 99",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        4764856
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/5/0099-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "151 Ill. 512",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5468441
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/151/0512-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "148 Ill. 490",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        3060831
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/148/0490-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "130 Ill. 98",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        12121714
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/130/0098-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "126 Ill. 493",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5404958
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/126/0493-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "115 Ill. 566",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2876358
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/115/0566-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "54 Ill. App. 274",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5102256
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/54/0274-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "113 Ill. 654",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2865088
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/113/0654-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 204,
    "char_count": 2310,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.528,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.08187156857407517
    },
    "sha256": "e414d84d7bf936be7383b952c4d01eba15f69638e8b3affc84afa48fb9bd8ada",
    "simhash": "1:ad6cb8033c040c2e",
    "word_count": 423
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:16:02.267508+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Walter H. Browne v. August F. Nussbaumer."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Adams\ndelivered the opinion of the court. Appellant sued appellee for compensation for services which he avers he performed for appellee, by appellee\u2019s request, in the sale or exchange of the latter\u2019s real property, and recovered judgment for the sum of $50, which he claims is less than he is entitled to. He moved for a new trial, which the court overruled, and he appealed.\nThe only objection argued by counsel is, that .there is no basis in the evidence for the verdict. The so-called bill of exceptions contains only the evidence. It does not contain a single exception, nor does it contain a motion for a new trial. The only references to a motion for a new trial are in the common-law record, or record proper. The statement by the clerk in the judgment order, or elsewhere in . the record proper, is not sufficient. James v. Dexter et al., 113 Ill. 654; McIntosh v. Barnes, 54 Ill. App. 274. When a motion for a new trial is made and overruled, the motion, the ruling of the court thereon, and an exception to the ruling must appear, in the bill of exceptions; otherwise the ruling will not be reviewed here. James v. Dexter, supra; Graham v. The People, 115 Ill. 566; Firemen\u2019s Ins. Co. v. Peck, 126 Ill. 493; Steffy v. The People, 130 Ill. 98; East \u2022 St. L. E. St. R\u2019d Co. v. Cauley, 148 Ill. 490; C. R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Town of Calumet, 151 Ill. 512; Van Cott v. Sprague, 5 Ill. App. 99; Schmidt v. Skelly, 9 Ill. App. 532; Cline v. T. St. L. etc. R\u2019d Co., 41 Ill. App. 516; E. St. L. E. \u2022 St. R\u2019d Co. v. Cauley, 49 Ill. App. 310; Schwartz v. Kerloosky, 51 Ill. App. 371.\nThe judgment will be affirmed.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Adams"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mbrki & Potter, for appellant.",
      "Ho appearance for appellee.\u00ab"
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Walter H. Browne v. August F. Nussbaumer.\nGen. No. 11,685.\n1. Verdict\u2014when not reviewed in order to ascertain whether it is contrary to the weight of the evidence. Where the bill of exceptions does not show a motion for a new trial, the action of the court overruling the same and an exception to such ruling, the question as to whether the verdict is contrary to the evidence,, will not be considered on appeal.\nAction of assumpsit. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Charles M. Walker, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1904.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed January 5, 1905.\nMbrki & Potter, for appellant.\nHo appearance for appellee.\u00ab"
  },
  "file_name": "0501-01",
  "first_page_order": 517,
  "last_page_order": 518
}