{
  "id": 4861340,
  "name": "John W. Frieze v. The People, etc.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Frieze v. People",
  "decision_date": "1883-04-13",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "349",
  "last_page": "351",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "12 Ill. App. 349"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "98 Ill. 581",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2837982
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/98/0581-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "97 Ill. 270",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2844382
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/97/0270-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "93 Ill. 112",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2735704
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/93/0112-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "83 Ill. 444",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2660705
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/83/0444-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "39 Ill. 26",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5259828
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/39/0026-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "37 Ill. 459",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5291781
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/37/0459-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "50 Ill. 200",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "2 Scam. 528",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Scam.",
      "case_ids": [
        2474857
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/3/0528-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "21 Ill. 87",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2599561
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/21/0087-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "45 Ill. 152",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        424988
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/45/0152-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "63 Ill. 77",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2610446
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/63/0077-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "85 Ill. 569",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2778418
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/85/0569-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "91 Ill. 408",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "86 Ill. 62",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2774135
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/86/0062-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "58 Ill. 417",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5236767
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/58/0417-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "64 Ill. 510",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5307851
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/64/0510-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "70 Ill. 297",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5310194
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/70/0297-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "49 Ill. 62",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2602008
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/49/0062-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "11 Wheat. 59",
      "category": "reporters:scotus_early",
      "reporter": "Wheat.",
      "case_ids": [
        1428689
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/us/24/0059-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "46 Ill. 460",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5298064
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/46/0460-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "39 Ill. 164",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5260766
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/39/0164-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "2 Dall. 357",
      "category": "reporters:scotus_early",
      "reporter": "Dall.",
      "case_ids": [
        11747592,
        12117240
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/us/2/0357-01",
        "/f-cas/26/1282-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "7 Allen, 541",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Allen",
      "case_ids": [
        2123024
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/mass/89/0541-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "34 Miss. 85",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Miss.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "18 Ohio, 221",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ohio",
      "case_ids": [
        497787
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ohio/18/0221-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "5 Wheat. 201",
      "category": "reporters:scotus_early",
      "reporter": "Wheat.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "4 Blackf. 101",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Blackf.",
      "case_ids": [
        1388281
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/blackf/4/0101-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "3 Scam. 326",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Scam.",
      "case_ids": [
        2471162
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/4/0326-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "80 Ill. 236",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2681238
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/80/0236-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "78 Ill. 212",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        824054
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/78/0212-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 310,
    "char_count": 3459,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.595,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.15408369368252745
    },
    "sha256": "8e532cc58e4c72d83f26d29e9e6afa217cb3b7933fb18f29c570db4364211a65",
    "simhash": "1:1f270c07d5401586",
    "word_count": 637
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:05:21.386693+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "John W. Frieze v. The People, etc."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Cueiam.\nThe principal errors assigned upon this record seek to question various supposed rulings of the trial court overruling a motion for a continuance of the case, ad-' uniting and refusing to admit testimony, and giving and refusing instructions. These matters should have been preserved in a bill of exceptions and filed in the county court and made a part of its record. There is what purports to be a bill of exceptions attached to the record, but it is not by the clerk as a part of the record.\nWe are thus precluded from a consideration of most of the matters urged by plaintiff in error.\nThe judgment is affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Cueiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mr. J. F. Taylor, for plaintiff in error;",
      "Mr. James A. Rose, for defendant in error;"
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "John W. Frieze v. The People, etc.\nAbsence op bill op exceptions. \u2014 What purports to be a bill of exceptions is attached to the record in this case, but it is not certified by the clerk as a part of the record. The court is thus precluded from a consideration of most of the matters urged by plaintiff in error.\nError to the County Court of Pope county; the Hon. Daniel M. Browning, Judge, presiding.\nOpinion filed April 13, 1883\nMr. J. F. Taylor, for plaintiff in error;\nthat the affidavit containing all the requirements of the statute and the evidence being shown to be material, the court should have granted a continuance, cited Wray v. The People, 78 Ill. 212; Cawley v. The People, 80 Ill. 236; Sprague v. Heaps, 7 Bradwell, 447; Switzer v. Lottenville, 4 Bradwell, 219.\nAs to the practice of making distinct and separate statements of the same offense in an indictment: Curtis v. The People, Breeze, 256; Townsend v. The People, 3 Scam. 326; McGregg v. State, 4 Blackf. 101; U. S. v. Pirates, 5 Wheat. 201.\nEvidence of another crime than the one charged is not allowed to be given in evidence: Burton v. State, 18 Ohio, 221; Cole v. Commonwealth, 5 Grat. 696; Reg v. Butler, 2 C. & K. 221; State v. Martin, 34 Miss. 85; Commonwealth v. Campbell, 7 Allen, 541; U. S. v. Mitchell, 2 Dall. 357.\nWhere there is a variance between the verdict and indictment, the judgment will be reversed: Millian v. The People, 6 Bradwell, 537; Fanning v. N. W. Mut. Life Ins. Co., 6 Bradwell, 536.\nBelief must be based on the evidence: Champion Iron Fence Co. v. Bradley, 10 Bradwell, 328; Parker v. Fisher, 39 Ill. 164.\nInstructions must be relevant to the case: Harnit v. Thompson, 46 Ill. 460; Etting v. Bank U. S., 11 Wheat. 59; Bullock v. Narrot, 49 Ill. 62.\nWhere there is a conflict of evidence, instructions should be clear, accurate and perspicuous: Volk v. Roche, 70 Ill. 297; C. B. & Q. R. R. Co. v. Van Patten, 64 Ill. 510; Chapin v. Thompson, 7 Bradwell, 288; Goodkind v. Rogan, 8 Bradwell, 413; Keys v. Fuller, 7 Bradwell, 528; Adams v. Smith, 58 Ill. 417; Cushman v. Cogswell, 86 Ill. 62.\nAn improper instruction is not cured by others which state the law correctly: Wabash Co. v. Henks, 91 Ill. 408; O. O. & F. R. V. R. R. Co. v. McMath, 4 Bradwell, 356.\nMr. James A. Rose, for defendant in error;\nas to a motion to quash indictment, cited Keedy v. The People, 85 Ill. 569.\nAs to continuance: Birks v. Houston, 63 Ill. 77; Steele v. The People, 45 Ill. 152; Shook v. Thomas, 21 Ill. 87; McConnel v. Johnson, 2 Scam. 528; Moore\u2019s Criminal Law, 62.\nAs to form of verdict: Davis v. The People, 50 Ill. 200; Armstrong v. The People, 37 Ill. 459; Bond v. The People, 39 Ill. 26.\nAs to evidence: Creote v. Wily, 83 Ill. 444; Eastman v. The People, 93 Ill. 112; Gainey v. The People, 97 Ill. 270; Rodgers v. The People, 98 Ill. 581."
  },
  "file_name": "0349-01",
  "first_page_order": 345,
  "last_page_order": 347
}