{
  "id": 5306098,
  "name": "Mutual Reserve Fund Life Association v. Philip Mischler, et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'n v. Mischler",
  "decision_date": "1905-04-20",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "251",
  "last_page": "251",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "120 Ill. App. 251"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 101,
    "char_count": 1026,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.534,
    "sha256": "e435309a07d98af2a991babcbfc3119db62c3078f129789bc46e2f3c71d48e9a",
    "simhash": "1:584af0cbe8724872",
    "word_count": 170
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T14:38:55.672753+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Mutual Reserve Fund Life Association v. Philip Mischler, et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nIn this case judgment was rendered by the court below in favor of appellees and against appellant for \u00a7420.10, being the amount found to be due upon a certificate of insurance issued to Philip Mischler, June 7, 1879, by the Covenant Mutual Benefit Association, for \u00a72,500. All of the questions involved in this case are considered and determined in the case of Mutual Reserve Fund Life Association v. Chester H. Bolles et al., ante, p. 242, and in accordance with the views therein expressed the judgment of the Circuit Court is reversed.\nReversed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Kerrick & Bracken, for appellant; George Burnham, Jr., of counsel.",
      "A. G. Murray, for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Mutual Reserve Fund Life Association v. Philip Mischler, et al.\nThis case is controlled by the decision in Mutual Reserve Fund Life Assn. v. Bolles, ante, p. 242.\nAction of assumpsit. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Sangamon County; the Hon. James A. Creighton, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the November term, 1903.\nReversed.\nOpinion filed April 20, 1905.\nKerrick & Bracken, for appellant; George Burnham, Jr., of counsel.\nA. G. Murray, for appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0251-01",
  "first_page_order": 289,
  "last_page_order": 289
}