{
  "id": 875720,
  "name": "The Aultman-Taylor Machinery Company v. William Sheets",
  "name_abbreviation": "Aultman-Taylor Machinery Co. v. Sheets",
  "decision_date": "1905-11-28",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "466",
  "last_page": "467",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "123 Ill. App. 466"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "216 Ill. 624",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        3359668
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/216/0624-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 122,
    "char_count": 1339,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.578,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.0307618320604792
    },
    "sha256": "77274f6a8cb17a0a8eed1aec684a1b177f743d24a1aa8ea207623e0e5fa1d04b",
    "simhash": "1:1f46a9b77cbb0434",
    "word_count": 232
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:23:11.271447+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The Aultman-Taylor Machinery Company v. William Sheets."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nIt does not appear from the abstract of the bill of exceptions that has been furnished tons that any motion for a new trial was made or that any ruling was made upon any such motion. Ho question therefore arises in this court as to the propriety of the rulings of the Circuit Court upon the admission or rejection of evidence, the giving or refusal of instructions, or as to the weight of the evidetice, or the amount of the verdict and judgment, or any other matter pertaining to the question whether a new trial should be granted. Odin Coal Co. v. Fadlock, 216 Ill. 624.\nThe judgment will be affirmed.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "H. S. Tanner, Salmans & Draper and Pen well & Bindley, for appellant.",
      "Dundas & . O\u2019Hair, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "The Aultman-Taylor Machinery Company v. William Sheets.\n1. Review\u2014what essential to. In order to review questions pertaining to the admission or rejection of evidence, the giving or refusal of instructions, or as to the weight of the evidence or the amount of the verdict and judgment, it is essential that a motion for a new trial shall have been made and a ruling had thereon followed by an exception.\nAction of assumpsit. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Edgar County; the Hon. Morton W. Thompson, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the November term, 1904.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed November 28, 1905.\nH. S. Tanner, Salmans & Draper and Pen well & Bindley, for appellant.\nDundas & . O\u2019Hair, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0466-01",
  "first_page_order": 486,
  "last_page_order": 487
}