{
  "id": 2483648,
  "name": "William Kent v. Buda Foundry & Manufacturing Company; Murry Nelson v. Buda Foundry & Manufacturing Company",
  "name_abbreviation": "Kent v. Buda Foundry & Manufacturing Co.",
  "decision_date": "1907-01-07",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 12,530; Gen. No. 12,532",
  "first_page": "65",
  "last_page": "66",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "131 Ill. App. 65"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 125,
    "char_count": 1496,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.556,
    "sha256": "7594505cc3732b57227219412190bb2eca74551f2bcbdcef25285dfc09e8ddda",
    "simhash": "1:5853d39b26001292",
    "word_count": 251
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:03:26.003810+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "William Kent v. Buda Foundry & Manufacturing Company. Murry Nelson v. Buda Foundry & Manufacturing Company."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Adams\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nThese appeals are from the same decree. In each of them the transcript is certified to be per praecipe, and contains only the decree appealed from and the appeal bond, although it plainly appears from the decree that the cause was heard on- the pleadings and the master\u2019s report, which included the evidence and his conclusions of fact and law. There is nothing in the transcript, in either of the appeals, to show that the appellant filed any exceptions to the master\u2019s report.\nThe decree in each of the appeals will be affirmed.\nAffirmed.\nMr. Justice Brown took no part in the consideration or decision of these appeals.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Adams"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Murray Nelson, Jr., and Samuel Adams, for appellants.",
      "Scott, Bancroft, Lord & Stephens, and I. K. Boyesen, for appellees; E. R. Bliss, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "William Kent v. Buda Foundry & Manufacturing Company. Murry Nelson v. Buda Foundry & Manufacturing Company.\nGen. No. 12,530.\nGen. No. 12,532.\n1. Decree\u2014when will not he reviewed. A decree will not be reviewed where it appears from the decree that the cause was heard on the pleadings and the master\u2019s report, which included the evidence and his conclusions of fact and law, and the transcript does not contain anything more than the decree appealed from and the appeal bond.\nChancery proceeding. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Murray F. Tuley, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the March term, 1906.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed January 7, 1907.\nMurray Nelson, Jr., and Samuel Adams, for appellants.\nScott, Bancroft, Lord & Stephens, and I. K. Boyesen, for appellees; E. R. Bliss, of counsel."
  },
  "file_name": "0065-01",
  "first_page_order": 81,
  "last_page_order": 82
}