{
  "id": 2470980,
  "name": "Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Company et al. v. Fred H. Steinkuehler",
  "name_abbreviation": "Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. Steinkuehler",
  "decision_date": "1907-06-01",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "233",
  "last_page": "233",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "134 Ill. App. 233"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 124,
    "char_count": 1228,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.535,
    "sha256": "0355f35035f5c5d223d94e55a9d58f386d58e5073e309df9021c42bd0438379f",
    "simhash": "1:776c376808eb2bf4",
    "word_count": 209
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:49:52.486265+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Company et al. v. Fred H. Steinkuehler."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nAppellee as the owner of lots No. 158 and 159 in the Car Shops addition to the city of Jacksonville recovered a verdict and judgment against appellants for $400 fot damages alleged to have resulted to said property by reason of the construction and operation of a railroad.\nThe questions presented by the record in this case are the same as those involved in the case of DeFreitas against the same defendants, and the opinion in -that case this day filed in this court controls the disposition of this case. (Ante, p. 228.)\nIf appellee will, within 20 days, remit $100 from the amount of his judgment, it will be affirmed for $300, otherwise the judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded.\nAffirmed upon remittitur. Remittitur filed and judgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Kirby & Wilson, for appellants.",
      "John A. Bellatti, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Company et al. v. Fred H. Steinkuehler.\nThis case is controlled by the decision in C., B. & Q. Ry. Co. et al. v. DeFreitas, ante, p. 228.\nAction on the case. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Morgan county; the Hon. Owen P. Thompson, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the November term, 1906.\nAffirmed upon remittitur.\nOpinion filed June 1, 1907.\nKirby & Wilson, for appellants.\nJohn A. Bellatti, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0233-01",
  "first_page_order": 251,
  "last_page_order": 251
}