{
  "id": 2470513,
  "name": "The People, ex rel. Charles Smith, v. Village of Rossville et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "People ex rel. Smith v. Village of Rossville",
  "decision_date": "1907-06-01",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "387",
  "last_page": "388",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "134 Ill. App. 387"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "223 Ill. 367",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        3336110
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/223/0367-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "52 Ill. App. 23",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5107428
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/52/0023-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 173,
    "char_count": 1904,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.491,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.08117596817420629
    },
    "sha256": "353a014408d716e975473033e0b8879c8af115c24d8b1b4a4b1187a9c73947b5",
    "simhash": "1:35acd28299250756",
    "word_count": 330
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:49:52.486265+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The People, ex rel. Charles Smith, v. Village of Rossville et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThis is a petition for a writ of mandamus to compel certain members of the board of trustees of the village of Rossville to attend meetings of said board. A demurrer was sustained to said petition. The subsequent proceedings as they - appear in the abstract of the record filed in this court were the following: \u201cDemurrer sustained\u2014petitioner duly excepts, and elects to stand by his petition. Judgment for costs, appeal prayed and allowed. Bond, $100 in 30 days from July 19th, A. D. 1906.\u201d\nThe foregoing- record recites an election by petitioner to stand by his petition, bnt such election only authorized the court to enter a final judgment and cannot be held to have the effect to take the place of such judgment. The judgment for costs does not dismiss the petition or the suit or terminate the action. It is, therefore, not final, but interlocutory merely, and this court has no jurisdiction to entertain an appeal therefrom. Lee v. Yanaway, 52 Ill. App. 23. And this is so notwithstanding no question as to jurisdiction has been raised or argued by appellee. Where the law has not conferred jurisdiction upon a court, the'parties to a suit cannot by consent invest such court with jurisdiction. Town of Audubon v. Hand, 223 Ill. 367; Meyer v. City, ante, p. 385.\nThe appeal must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction, at the costs of relator, with leave to withdraw the record, and to either-party to move for judgment in the Circuit Court.\nAppeal dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Curtis G. Redden and J. B. Mann, for appellant.",
      "W. M. Acton, for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "The People, ex rel. Charles Smith, v. Village of Rossville et al.\nThis case is controlled by the decision in Meyer v. City of Decatur, ante, p. 385.\nMandamus. Appeal from the County Court of Vermilion county; the Hon. E. R. E. Kimbrough, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the November term, 1906.\nAppeal dismissed.\nOpinion filed June 1, 1907.\nCurtis G. Redden and J. B. Mann, for appellant.\nW. M. Acton, for appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0387-01",
  "first_page_order": 405,
  "last_page_order": 406
}