{
  "id": 2470940,
  "name": "Charles Bogardus v. Ph\u0153nix Manufacturing Company",
  "name_abbreviation": "Bogardus v. Ph\u0153nix Manufacturing Co.",
  "decision_date": "1907-06-01",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "461",
  "last_page": "462",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "134 Ill. App. 461"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 84,
    "char_count": 791,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.575,
    "sha256": "3fe4c60de845481744e7c9e4fa8045dcde2e01ce031f469239ece66a2d8d51be",
    "simhash": "1:5aee5f624821ea60",
    "word_count": 130
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:49:52.486265+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Charles Bogardus v. Ph\u0153nix Manufacturing Company."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Curiam.\nThe questions here involved are identical with those discussed in Bogardus v. Ph\u0153nix Manufacturing Company, ante, p. 456, and the holdings therein announced are decisive of this case. The judgment in favor of appellee in the sum of $1,122.50 is affirmed.\nAffirmed.\nAppellant\u2019s motion to tax cost of blue print to appellee is allowed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "M. H. Cloud and Kebb & Bindley, for appellant.",
      "P. E. Beach and E. M. Thompson, for appellee; Bundy & Wilcox, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Charles Bogardus v. Ph\u0153nix Manufacturing Company.\nThis case is controlled by the decision in Bogardus v. Ph\u0153nix Mfg. Co., ante, p. 456.\nAssumpsit. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Ford county; the Hon. Thomas M. Harris, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the November term, 1906.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed June 1, 1907.\nM. H. Cloud and Kebb & Bindley, for appellant.\nP. E. Beach and E. M. Thompson, for appellee; Bundy & Wilcox, of counsel."
  },
  "file_name": "0461-01",
  "first_page_order": 479,
  "last_page_order": 480
}