{
  "id": 2471891,
  "name": "Acorn Brass Manufacturing Company v. James Gilmore",
  "name_abbreviation": "Acorn Brass Manufacturing Co. v. Gilmore",
  "decision_date": "1907-06-01",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "614",
  "last_page": "614",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "134 Ill. App. 614"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "113 Ill. App. 296",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        872929
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/113/0296-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "113 Ill. App. 496",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        872849
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/113/0496-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 136,
    "char_count": 1611,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.484,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.08118967553706799
    },
    "sha256": "a9c929154fb8697ebdd5c2bd41d2774c330e212f10ebd2a012361f1b6943d71c",
    "simhash": "1:1d4ed587782f1638",
    "word_count": 265
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:49:52.486265+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Acorn Brass Manufacturing Company v. James Gilmore."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mb. Peesiding Justice Bamsat\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nThe Acorn Brass Manufacturing Company began suit in the Circuit Court of Vermilion county against James Gilmore, and filed its declaration to which the trial court sustained a demurrer. Plaintiff in error elected to abide by its declaration whereupon the court made the following order: \u201cIt is therefore ordered and adjudged by the court that said defendant have and recover of and from said plaintiff his costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.\u201d\nThe judgment so entered was interlocutory and not final.\nThis question was determined in People, for use of Phillips, v. Severson, 113 Ill. App. 496, and in Meyer v. City of Decatur, ante, p. 385, where an order in language almost identical with that above employed, was under consideration. The judgment appealed from not being final, the writ of error must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction, with leave to plaintiff in error to withdraw the record, and to either party to move for final judgment in the Circuit Court.\nThe writ of error is dismissed.\nWrit dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mb. Peesiding Justice Bamsat"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Winkleb, Bakes, .Thompson & Holdeb, for plaintiff in error.",
      "B. Allan Stephens and Swallow & Swallow, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Acorn Brass Manufacturing Company v. James Gilmore.\nThis case is controlled hy the decision in People v. Severson, 113 Ill. App. 296, and in Meyer v. City of Decatur, ante, p. 385.\nAssumpsit. Error to the Circuit Court of Vermilion county; the Hon. Morton W. Thompson, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the November term, 1906.\nWrit dismissed.\nOpinion filed June 1, 1907.\nWinkleb, Bakes, .Thompson & Holdeb, for plaintiff in error.\nB. Allan Stephens and Swallow & Swallow, for defendant in error."
  },
  "file_name": "0614-01",
  "first_page_order": 632,
  "last_page_order": 632
}