{
  "id": 2471790,
  "name": "L. Schindler v. James Edwards et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Schindler v. Edwards",
  "decision_date": "1907-06-12",
  "docket_number": "Gen No. 13,780",
  "first_page": "637",
  "last_page": "638",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "134 Ill. App. 637"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 140,
    "char_count": 1718,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.535,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.8973318884102604e-07,
      "percentile": 0.7298282641188734
    },
    "sha256": "ac8efa16afc64b6c83fa4c1e2905466fdba53fba0653ecc2f88a768872f12a90",
    "simhash": "1:c36be5abc893a87d",
    "word_count": 308
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:49:52.486265+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "L. Schindler v. James Edwards et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe writ of error in this case is dismissed. It was sued out in the teeth of the statute, known as the Municipal Court Act, approved May 18, 1905, and in force after adoption by the legal voters of Chicago on November 7, 1905.\nSection 23 of that Act, in speaking of cases of the fourth and fifth classes, previously described in the Act, provides that the time within which a writ of error may be sued out in any such case shall be limited to thirty days a,fter the entry of the final order or judgment complained of.\nThe cause involved here was of the \u201cfourth class,\u201d as described in section 2 of the Act. The final judgment in the Municipal Court was on the 23rd day of April, 1907, as appears from the transcript of the record before us.\nThe writ of error was sued out on June 11, 1907\u2014 forty-nine days thereafter. We are without jurisdiction to consider the cause.\nIt is no matter of regret, however, as an inspection of the transcript has satisfied us that were the cause properly before us, we should refuse the supersedeas on the merits.\nWrit of error dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Whitfield & Whitfield, for plaintiff in error.",
      "No appearance for \"defendants in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "L. Schindler v. James Edwards et al.\nGen No. 13,780.\nMunicipai. Court\u2014when Appellate Court without jurisdiction of writ of error sued out to review. To review cases known under the Municipal Court Act as cases of the fourth class, writs of error must be sued out within thirty days after the entry of the final order or judgment complained of.\nApplication for supersedeas. Error to the Municipal Court of the city of Chicago; the Hon. John Hume, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1907.\nDismissed.\nOpinion filed June 12, 1907.\nWhitfield & Whitfield, for plaintiff in error.\nNo appearance for \"defendants in error."
  },
  "file_name": "0637-01",
  "first_page_order": 655,
  "last_page_order": 656
}