{
  "id": 2466988,
  "name": "L. Rosenweig v. John McDermaid",
  "name_abbreviation": "Rosenweig v. McDermaid",
  "decision_date": "1907-08-06",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 4,850",
  "first_page": "595",
  "last_page": "596",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "135 Ill. App. 595"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "114 Ill. App. 29",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        2542754
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/114/0029-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "148 Ill. 490",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        3060831
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/148/0490-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 120,
    "char_count": 1564,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.523,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.08114083099053265
    },
    "sha256": "1bdaa06e833c89cb9e1b429d28f8e22c14074f3b3c9614677fc22bb94c63d430",
    "simhash": "1:0618ae21ba4c2524",
    "word_count": 269
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:29:53.595537+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "L. Rosenweig v. John McDermaid."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Thompson\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nThis is an action of forcible entry and detainer originally brought by appellee before a justice of the peace. The defendant, appellant here, took -an appeal from the judgment of the justice to the County Court. In the County Court a jury was waived. The case was tried before the judge and a judgment rendered in favor of plaintiff. Neither the abstract nor the bill of exceptions contains any exception to the findings or judgment of the court and no exception was taken to the rulings upon the propositions of law presented by appellant. In a case tried without a jury an exception to a ruling upon the admission of testimony cannot be considered upon an appeal unless an exception was taken to the judgment. East St. Louis Electric R. R. Co. v. Cauley, 148 Ill. 490; Hawley v. Huth, 114 Ill. App. 29. There being no question presented by this record for our consideration, the judgment is therefore affirmed.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Thompson"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "A. D. Early, for appellant.",
      "Fisher & Worth, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "L. Rosenweig v. John McDermaid.\nGen. No. 4,850.\nException\u2014what essential to review judgment in a case tried by court without a jury. In a case tried by the court without a jury, an exception to the rulings upon the admission of evidence cannot be considered upon appeal unless an exception was taken to the judgment.\nForcible entry and detainer. Appeal from the County Court of Winnebago county; the Hon. Louis M. Reckhow, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the April term, 1907.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed August 6, 1907.\nA. D. Early, for appellant.\nFisher & Worth, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0595-01",
  "first_page_order": 611,
  "last_page_order": 612
}