{
  "id": 4878373,
  "name": "Thomas Ratcliff v. Cincinnati Type Foundry et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Ratcliff v. Cincinnati Type Foundry",
  "decision_date": "1884-04-18",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "509",
  "last_page": "510",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "14 Ill. App. 509"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 79,
    "char_count": 956,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.473,
    "sha256": "bb8806ad75842fbbe7efa70d854eb9c55bbbe64e3a001379931b403133857c7a",
    "simhash": "1:c2de836068e66d51",
    "word_count": 164
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:36:53.324345+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Thomas Ratcliff v. Cincinnati Type Foundry et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Cubiam.\nWe are of opinion the court properly sustained the demurrer to the bill, but that the case must be reversed because the evidence upon which the damages were assessed is not preserved in the record.\nSo much of the decree as relates to the sustaining of the demurrer will therefore be affirmed, and so much of it as relates to the assessment of damages upon the dissolution of the injunction, will be reversed.\nAffirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Cubiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mr. J. C. Allen, for appellant.",
      "Messrs. Wilson & Hutchinson, for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Thomas Ratcliff v. Cincinnati Type Foundry et al.\nThe court is of opinion that the court properly sustained the demurrer to the bill, but as the evidence upon which the damages were assessed is not preserved in the record, the case is affirmed -in part, reversed in part and remanded.\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Richland county; the Hon. William C. Jones, Judge, presiding.\nOpinion filed April 18, 1884.\nMr. J. C. Allen, for appellant.\nMessrs. Wilson & Hutchinson, for appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0509-01",
  "first_page_order": 503,
  "last_page_order": 504
}