{
  "id": 2675847,
  "name": "Chicago Junction Railway Company, Appellee, v. Manhattan Brewing Company, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Chicago Junction Railway Co. v. Manhattan Brewing Co.",
  "decision_date": "1908-10-06",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 14,122",
  "first_page": "657",
  "last_page": "657",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "143 Ill. App. 657"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 105,
    "char_count": 1122,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.506,
    "sha256": "1113140d3c1be19c5ad3c1bf27944bb0467aef22d0f53752349184eb273948e0",
    "simhash": "1:4447b625158fba11",
    "word_count": 187
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:28:23.290304+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Chicago Junction Railway Company, Appellee, v. Manhattan Brewing Company, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Baker\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Baker"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mayer, Meyer & Austrian, for appellant.",
      "Winston, Payne, Strawn & Shaw, for appellee; John D. Black and Max H. Whitney, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Chicago Junction Railway Company, Appellee, v. Manhattan Brewing Company, Appellant.\nGen. No. 14,122.\nThis was an appeal by the defendant from a judgment rendered in assumpsit recovered by the plaintiff for hauling certain cars for the defendant. No question of law was decided by the court, the controversy being with respect to what tariff rates should be charged for the services in question. In conclusion the court says:\n\u201cWe think that the charges made by the plaintiff to the defendant based on the rates fixed by tariff 112 on incoming cars and on the rates fixed by tariff 129 on outgoing cars are proper charges, and that the amount of the recovery was due from the defendant to the plaintiff for the services in question.\u201d\nAssumpsit. Appeal from the County Court of Cook county; the Hon. W. H. Hinebaugh, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1907.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed October 6, 1908.\nMayer, Meyer & Austrian, for appellant.\nWinston, Payne, Strawn & Shaw, for appellee; John D. Black and Max H. Whitney, of counsel."
  },
  "file_name": "0657-01",
  "first_page_order": 675,
  "last_page_order": 675
}