{
  "id": 2669741,
  "name": "Paul Oscar Steidtmann, Appellant, v. The Joseph Lay Company, Appellee",
  "name_abbreviation": "Steidtmann v. Joseph Lay Co.",
  "decision_date": "1908-11-06",
  "docket_number": "Gen No. 13,438",
  "first_page": "453",
  "last_page": "454",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "144 Ill. App. 453"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "234 Ill. 84",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5640541
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/234/0084-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 147,
    "char_count": 2029,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.749,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.08335177070168956
    },
    "sha256": "201e2829f19ee532204a024605325b8ac0d092f9b6155e34cc930e7aa54015fc",
    "simhash": "1:deeadf0730068af4",
    "word_count": 343
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:46:41.053774+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Paul Oscar Steidtmann, Appellant, v. The Joseph Lay Company, Appellee."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Smith\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nIn Steidtmann v. Joseph Lay Co., 234 Ill. 84, the judgrnent of this court was reversed, and the cause was remanded to this court because there was no sufficient finding of facts incorporated in the judgment of this court, with directions that if the facts are held by this court to be different from the finding of the trial court, this court may found its judgment upon such different findings and to recite the facts so found in the judgment; but if the facts are not so found different from the finding of the trial court, the judgment should be reversed for the errors occurring on the trial and the cause remanded to the County Court.\nThe Supreme Court held that reversible error was committed by the trial court in excluding certain material evidence. It would be manifestly improper for us to consider and pass upon the merits of the cause until all the material evidence can be brought before us. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause is remanded to the County Court for the errors pointed out by the Supreme Court.\nReversed and remanded.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Smith"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "A. W. MARTIN and EDWARD H. S. MARTIN, for appellant.",
      "EMERSON E. McGriff, Frederick S. McClory and Lyman M. Paine, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Paul Oscar Steidtmann, Appellant, v. The Joseph Lay Company, Appellee.\nGen No. 13,438.\nAPPEALS AND ERRORS-when merits not subject to review. Upon reversal by the Supreme Court and remandment to the Appellate Court under a holding, among other things, that the trial court erred in excludin~g certain material evidence, the Appellate Court will not pass upon the merits of the cause.\nAssumpsit. Appeal from the County Court of Cook county; the Hon. ALVA F. WINGERT, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1907.\nReversed and judgment here.\nOpinion filed November 22, 1907.\n(Opinion not reported.) Reversed by Supreme Court and reinstated in this court October 23, 1908.\nReversed and remanded.\nOpinion filed November 6, 1908.\nA. W. MARTIN and EDWARD H. S. MARTIN, for appellant.\nEMERSON E. McGriff, Frederick S. McClory and Lyman M. Paine, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0453-01",
  "first_page_order": 469,
  "last_page_order": 470
}