{
  "id": 2659243,
  "name": "Virgil P. Mays, Defendant in Error, v. United States Express Company, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Mays v. United States Express Co.",
  "decision_date": "1909-01-26",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 14,226",
  "first_page": "387",
  "last_page": "388",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "146 Ill. App. 387"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "237 Ill. 247",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        3387059
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/237/0247-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "237 Ill. 247",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        3387059
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/237/0247-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 82,
    "char_count": 819,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.518,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.0832685612172756
    },
    "sha256": "6aa277a7572e826b6f01b506dbf8d7049c22e72f61f2a7379c196d296ce44ecb",
    "simhash": "1:cd661c659349b038",
    "word_count": 136
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:03:54.613219+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Virgil P. Mays, Defendant in Error, v. United States Express Company, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Baker\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nThe question presented in this case was decided adversely to the contention of plaintiff in error in Cutter v. Wells Fargo & Co., 237 Ill., 247. On the authority of that case the judgment in this case will be affirmed.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Baker"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Winston, Payne, Strawn & Shaw and Winston, Lowy & McGinn, for plaintiff in error.",
      "W. W. Gurley and Arthur Dyrenforth, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Virgil P. Mays, Defendant in Error, v. United States Express Company, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 14,226.\nThis case is controlled by the decision in Cutter v. Wells Fargo & Co., 237 Ill. 247.\nTort. Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Wtt.t.tatw N. Cottbei\u00ed, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1908.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed January 26, 1909.\nWinston, Payne, Strawn & Shaw and Winston, Lowy & McGinn, for plaintiff in error.\nW. W. Gurley and Arthur Dyrenforth, for defendant in error."
  },
  "file_name": "0387-01",
  "first_page_order": 429,
  "last_page_order": 430
}