{
  "id": 2635795,
  "name": "Travellers Insurance Company, Appellant, v. Benjamin A. Leafgreen, Appellee",
  "name_abbreviation": "Travellers Insurance v. Leafgreen",
  "decision_date": "1909-06-25",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 15,412",
  "first_page": "155",
  "last_page": "157",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "150 Ill. App. 155"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "238 Ill. 577",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        3426699
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/238/0577-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 205,
    "char_count": 3398,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.52,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.0829625588209969
    },
    "sha256": "a7cb30eb7fed923201fd1d39b71293ea8035b6a818da43fa64d394291cded4c0",
    "simhash": "1:98fd1d21d7360a78",
    "word_count": 585
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:46:21.164089+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Travellers Insurance Company, Appellant, v. Benjamin A. Leafgreen, Appellee."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Me. Presiding Justice Chytraus\ndelivered the opinion of the court;\nAppellee has moved for an order of dismissal of this appeal. He points out that the judgment appealed from was rendered in the Municipal Court of Chicago on November 18, 1908, and that an authenticated copy of the record in the court below was not filed in the office of the clerk of this court within forty days after the rendition of the judgment appealed from. The case is one of the first class in the Municipal Court and the record was filed in this court on March 2, 1909. The right of appeal exists only by virtue of some statute. Appeals from judgments of the Municipal Court, in this class of cases, are allowed by section 22 of the Municipal Court Act, as it appears in the Revised Statutes of 1908. It is there provided, however, that authenticated copies of the records shall be filed within forty days after the rendition of the judgment appealed from, unless the Municipal Court shall, within forty days, grant further time. This enactment was approved June 3,1907, and adopted at an election held September 17, 1907. By the general practice act, chapter 110 of the Revised Statutes, as amended by an act approved January 25, 1908, and in force July 1, 1908, it is provided that \u201cAuthenticated copies of records of judgments * * * appealed from any court to the Appellate Courts shall be filed * * * on or before the second day of the succeeding term of said court,\u201d etc. This amendment of the practice act is the later and controlling enactment. Besides, regulations with reference to the practice and procedure in the Appellate Courts do not properly belong under the heading of \u201cAn Act in relation to a Municipal Court in the city of Chicago,\u201d and provisions regarding the time for filing the records in the Appellate Courts relate to the practice and procedure in those courts.\nFurthermore, it has been held and declared as the law of this state, by our Supreme Court, that no regulation of the practice in the Appellate Courts is authorized by section 34 of article 4 of the constitution of this state, and it was by virtue of that section of our constitution that the Municipal Court Act was! passed by the legislature. Clowry v. Holmes, 238 Ill. 577. It is our duty to follow the law as declared by our Supreme Court.\nThe record in this case was not filed too late; the motion to dismiss must be denied.\nMotion to dismiss denied.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Me. Presiding Justice Chytraus"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Horton & Miller, for appellant.",
      "Lee & Lee, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Travellers Insurance Company, Appellant, v. Benjamin A. Leafgreen, Appellee.\nGen. No. 15,412.\n1. Municipal Court\u2014what statute governs filing of transcript on appeal from. The transcript of the record made in the Municipal Court must be filed pursuant to the provisions of the Practice Act as amended in, 1908 rather than pursuant to section 22 of the Municipal Court Act; the Practice Act being the later enactment prevails; and, likewise, the regulation of practice in the Appellate Courts is not authorized by section 34 of Article IV of the Constitution pursuant to which the Municipal court law was enacted.\n2. Appeals and errors\u2014statutory right to appeal, The right to appeal exists only by virtue of some statute.\nAppeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Hosea W. Wells, Judge, presiding;\nHeard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1908.\nMotion to dismiss denied.\nOpinion filed June 25, 1909.\nHorton & Miller, for appellant.\nLee & Lee, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0155-01",
  "first_page_order": 171,
  "last_page_order": 173
}